Search for: "By CHRIS V. NICHOLSON"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2014, 3:09 pm
") And in Barfield v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:00 am
The case of Grainger v Nicholson, decided last year that a belief in global warming could amount to a philosophical belief for the purpose of those regulations, meaning that (in that case) Mr Nicholson was able to claim that his selection for redundancy was a manifestation of discrimination. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Peggy Nicholson (Student author),. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:20 am
Ben reviewed the two big questions at issue in Washington v. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 12:21 am
” Top 3 Kluwer Trademark Blog posts of September, October and November 1) Norway: Ridicule as a response to claims of trade mark infringement by Thomas Hvammen Nicholson “A trade mark infringement matter which has been making the headlines in Norway the last week concerns the small Norwegian beverage producer O. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 5:30 pm
Chris Van Hollen [D-MD] says that "House Democrats have not signed off on this deal" and that he has "some serious reservations about parts of this deal. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 5:30 pm
Chris Van Hollen [D-MD] says that "House Democrats have not signed off on this deal" and that he has "some serious reservations about parts of this deal. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm
Chris Sprigman: Did you cut by age, not just gender? [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 8:15 am
Sys. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 8:08 am
In the context of content moderation (and platform regulation more broadly), this can mean that rather than the flat on-off debates we are currently having (as with the debate over Section 230 in Gonzalez v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am
"Melissa Wasserman & Chris Walker – PTAB adjudication is not unusual except that agency head lacks final decision-making authority. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
JUNE The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
