Search for: "By PETER LATTMAN"
Results 281 - 300
of 420
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2007, 8:48 am
Meanwhile, over at the WSJ Law Blog, Peter Lattman gets in a cheap double entendre at Monica's expense: Are we this poor woman's only defenders? [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 5:11 pm
" Also, at the Wall Street Journal Law Blog, Peter Lattman points out that the increased rates are due in part to increased costs, such as the $160,000 salaries that many large firms are now paying to first-year associates. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 7:33 am
Louis Post-Dispatch via How Appealing] * Even more fun than charades: take Peter Lattman to a party, start reading out random newspaper headlines, and challenge him to find a legal angle to the stories. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 9:44 am
According to our friend and private-equity reporter Peter Lattman, the settlement represents a win in the chemicals maker’s fight to recover damages over the busted buyout by private-equity firm Apollo Management LP. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 8:01 am
Here’s the WSJ report by LB alum Peter Lattman and Heidi Moore. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 3:01 pm
Lee and Bain Capital — went on the litigation offensive, filing lawsuits in Texas and New York against a syndicate of Wall Street banks in an effort to force them to fund the firms’ $19 billion buyout, according to a dispatch from the Journal’s Matthew Karnitschnig and our very own law blog alumnus Peter Lattman. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 9:02 pm
Peter Lattman's link at the WSJ law blog (Dec. 14) draws out numerous posters who appear to approve of the idea, though. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 9:20 am
Peter Lattman's post is headed "Are the Supremes Starstruck Like the Rest of Us? [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
Source: New York Times, "Ex-Goldman director to serve 2 years in insider case," Peter Lattman, Oct. 24, 2012 [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 4:39 am
” Peter Lattman writing in today’s Dealbook reports that the judge not only accepted the Probation Office’s recommendation, but slammed the prosecutors. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 4:49 pm
Peter Lattman writes on The New York Times DealBook Blog about the case here. [read post]
21 May 2007, 4:24 pm
Over the weekend, Mark Sherman reported here for the Associated Press on Justice Thomas's silence during every oral argument this term; Peter Lattman discusses his reticence here at the WSJ.com Law Blog; and Steve Benen of The Carpetbagger Report weighs in here. [read post]
21 May 2007, 10:26 am
In addition, Stohr reports here on the Court's decision to review states' power to tax the interest on other states' municipal bonds for Bloomberg; Peter Lattman weighs in here on the Kentucky municipal bond case at the WSJ.com Law Blog; Caron has this post on today's grant in Davis at the TaxProf Blog; and the AP has this report. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 2:51 pm
[Erie Times-News]* Peter Lattman looks at David Zornow, the global head of litigation at Skadden, and Zornow’s obsession with Bob Dylan — reflected in a mock indictment of “The Judges,” drawn up by “special assistant U.S. attorney Bob Dylan. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 11:49 am
Peter Lattman writes on The New York Times DealBook Blog about the case here. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
Then just last week, Peter Lattman, a reporter with The New York Times wrote a story reporting that the Securities and Exchange Commission has sent information requests to persons trading in the shares of Facebook, Inc. and three other companies. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 7:40 pm
(See this Journal story from Law Blog alum Peter Lattman about that lower-court decision.) [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 2:56 pm
And Peter Lattman has this post on Kevin Merida and Michael Fletcher's new biography, Supreme Discomfort: The Divided Soul of Clarence Thomas. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 4:05 am
For more information and analysis, visit Peter Lattman at the WSJ Law Blog (original complaint & answer included) and Ron Coleman at Likelihood of Confusion (whose original analysis of the subject may have inspired Tiffany). [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 4:27 pm
In today's Wall Street Journal, Greg Hitt reports here (subscription req'd) on a patent law battle that has moved from the High Court to the Senate floor, "where a committee is set today to consider legislation back by Democratic and Republican leaders that would make patents harder to get and easier to challenge"; Peter Lattman weighs in here at the WSJ.com Law Blog. [read post]
