Search for: "By PETER LATTMAN"
Results 281 - 300
of 420
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2007, 3:43 pm
Peter Lattman has this post at the WSJ.com Law Blog discussing the editorial and highlighting the "playful exchange" between Justice Souter and Justice Stevens in the opinion. [read post]
23 May 2007, 2:41 pm
" Which leads to my next point: Peter Lattman reports that Mike Dillon, the GC of Sun, predicts that "The traditional law-firm model is going the way of the Mastodon. [read post]
22 May 2007, 3:42 pm
Twombly, making it more difficult for private plaintiffs to file antitrust claims against large companies; Professor Scott Dodson weighs in here at Civil Procedure Prof Blog; at Volokh Conspiracy, Einer Elhauge has these thoughts; Patti Waldmeir of the Financial Times has this story; in the Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin reports here (subscription req'd); and Peter Lattman has this post at the WSJ.com Law Blog. [read post]
22 May 2007, 7:42 am
For more, see Francis Pileggi, Peter Lattman, and Steve Bainbridge. [read post]
21 May 2007, 5:26 pm
Peter Lattman reports:As if it wasn't already influential enough, the Delaware state legislature recently amended its constitution to allow the SEC to ask the Delaware Supreme Court to answer questions of Delaware law. [read post]
21 May 2007, 4:24 pm
Over the weekend, Mark Sherman reported here for the Associated Press on Justice Thomas's silence during every oral argument this term; Peter Lattman discusses his reticence here at the WSJ.com Law Blog; and Steve Benen of The Carpetbagger Report weighs in here. [read post]
21 May 2007, 10:26 am
In addition, Stohr reports here on the Court's decision to review states' power to tax the interest on other states' municipal bonds for Bloomberg; Peter Lattman weighs in here on the Kentucky municipal bond case at the WSJ.com Law Blog; Caron has this post on today's grant in Davis at the TaxProf Blog; and the AP has this report. [read post]
21 May 2007, 8:25 am
Peter Lattman quoted my University of Illinois colleague Andrew Morriss as writing in a letter to the editor that a better remedy would be "consigning Mr. [read post]
19 May 2007, 11:10 am
Peter Lattman did a post at the Wall Street Journal Law Blog, which drew the usual collection of outraged comments. [read post]
18 May 2007, 9:04 am
Peter Lattman reported on Gary Farmer, a Florida judge who decided to try his hand at humorous legal writing in the course of deciding a lawsuit. [read post]
16 May 2007, 9:35 pm
PETER LATTMAN: Is it okay for lawyers to copy complaints? [read post]
16 May 2007, 3:20 pm
Peter Lattman has this post about Mauro's story at the WSJ.com Law Blog. [read post]
16 May 2007, 1:44 pm
Today Peter Lattman has an excellent post on a dispute over complaints. [read post]
11 May 2007, 1:43 pm
" Peter Lattman of the WSJ.com Law Blog has this post discussing the Court's "controversial" KSR ruling and the first opinion applying the obviousness standard post-KSR. [read post]
11 May 2007, 6:10 am
" Peter Zura's 271 Patent BlogKSR v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 3:00 am
Peter Lattman reports that my old friend, former Houstonian and current Las Vegas criminal defense lawyer extraordinaire David Chesnoff had an interesting morning this past Sunday after the De La Hoya-Mayweather fight Saturday night in Las Vegas: Las Vegas police arrested HBO Chairman Chris Albrecht early Sunday morning for allegedly assaulting a female companion. [read post]
8 May 2007, 6:02 pm
Once Peter Lattman of WSJ.com's "Law Blog" tires of poking fun at the formal attire worn by the Justices serving on Canada's highest court, he can turn his attention to the formal attire worn by the judges serving on Maryland's highest court. [read post]
6 May 2007, 8:53 pm
Peter Lattman's indispensable Wall Street Journal Law Blog also posts on the story, drawing some interesting comments. [read post]
4 May 2007, 10:10 pm
Notes Peter Lattman at the WSJ law blog, "The plaintiffs'... [read post]
2 May 2007, 7:03 pm
Peter Lattman of the WSJ.com Law Blog has this post on Vonage's request to the Federal Circuit to send its patent case back to the district court. [read post]
