Search for: "By PETER LATTMAN" Results 81 - 100 of 252
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2008, 6:10 am
Peter Lattman, The Law Blog's Laugh-in at the Supreme Courts: Wow, Jan. 15, 2007. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 2:14 am
:The Law Blog's Laugh-In At the Supreme Court: Wow Posted by Peter LattmanThe big news out of the Supreme Court yesterday concerned what they didn't do. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
Peter Lattman, claqueing on the WSJ's law blog, congratulates his colleagues for their "amusing" lead and "zinger" conclusion; at least he has the decency not to applaud their logic.The Yale non-issue is an even bigger red herring. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 9:02 pm
Peter Lattman's link at the WSJ law blog (Dec. 14) draws out numerous posters who appear to approve of the idea, though. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 1:02 pm
Peter Lattman at the WSJ Law Blog asks whether a lawyer's reporting the name of person in a coma then passing away a few weeks shy of his 25th birthday in hope that the victims family calls the lawyer is fair game or gives the plaintiffs bar a bad name? [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 8:38 am
The WSJ Law Blog per Peter Lattman asks the question here, about a Florida case, with lots of readers' comments after the fold. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 10:28 am
The Wall Street Journal has an article -- Rulings Bolster Insurers, by Liam Plevin and Peter Lattman -- that discusses the tide of pro-insurance appellate rulings in the Katrina litigation. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 7:22 am
The WSJ law blog's Peter Lattman is now reporting from Scruggs hometown Oxford, Miss. and (with co-reporter Paolo Prada) is in today's paper with "It's Party Time For Dickie Scruggs In Oxford, Miss. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 12:00 pm
First Master the Tax Code, by Peter Lattman: For those young associates and law students out there interested in rising to the top ranks of an elite... [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 11:30 am
(Peter Lattman and Ashby Jones, "In Scruggs Probe, Focus Turns to Another Lawyer", WSJ, Dec. 1)(sub-only). [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 10:01 am
The Wall Street Journal has an article -- In Scruggs Probe, Focus Turns to Another Lawyer, by Peter Lattman and Ashby Jones -- that suggests that Timothy Balducci is cooperating with the government prosecutors in connection with the alleged attempted... [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 4:21 pm by jesse londin
(You can ask Mike Gold, but according to Air & Space, it's Yippie-yi-yo, Yippie-yi-yay, the chorus from the 'cowboy ballad' Ghostriders in the Sky.)Finally, the joke about "a blood-sucking mosquito lawyer" in Bee Movie, (as referenced today by brave Peter Lattman in the WSJ's Law Blog) is not about space lawyer.That's it. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:47 am
Thomas Geoghegan's See You in Court: How the Right Made America a Lawsuit Nation was, as Peter Lattman notes, reviewed favorably by Adam Liptak this weekend. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 4:18 am
By Peter Lattman Here in the states, Axiom Legal has establish a niche as a provider of high-end temp services to blue-chip corporate clients. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 8:30 am
There's additional commentary on the piece over at the WSJ Law Blog, by Jamie Heller (filling in for Peter Lattman, who is on his honeymoon). [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 1:38 pm
"We noted with particular interest his posting Sovereign Immunity at Street Level, citing to Peter Lattman at the Wall Street Journal Law Blog and his posting titled Critics Take Aim at California's Patent Shield.State universities such as the University of California claim to be beneficiaries of the doctrine of sovereign immunity, according to which THEY can sue private citizens for patent or copyright infringement of patents or copyrights owned by such universities, but… [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 12:45 pm
Well, Peter Lattman and the WSJ Law Blog have gotten to the bottom of this oddness. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:23 pm
Patent law, Peter Lattman of The Wall Street Journal is shocked (shocked!) [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 6:30 am
The Wall Street Journal's Peter Lattman had a great story yesterday about criticism of a recent decision by the nation??? [read post]