Search for: "Byers v. Byers" Results 1 - 20 of 108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2010, 2:08 am by traceydennis
Byers and Others v Yacht Bull Corporation and Another Chancery Division “The court had no jurisdiction to hear a claim by English liquidators to beneficial ownership of a yacht acquired by money from Madoff Securities International Ltd. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 2:09 am by sally
Byers and others v Yacht Bull Corpn and another [2010] EWHC 133 (Ch); [2010] WLR (D) 18 “A claim to beneficial ownership of a yacht did not fall within the exception contained in art 1(2)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters so that the Regulation did not apply to ‘proceedings relating to the winding up of insolvent companies’. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 10:28 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But the constructive discharge claim is dismissed for good.The case is Byer v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 4:19 pm by Steven D. Schwinn
Schwinn, John Marshall Law School Judge Rudolph Contreras (D.D.C.) ruled in Byers v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 2:38 am by CMS
In this post, Adam Ferris (Senior Associate) in the Finance Disputes Team at CMS and Henry Powell (Associate) in the Real Estate Disputes Team at CMS comment on the judgment of the Supreme Court in Byers and Ors v Saudi National Bank [2023] UKSC 51, which was handed down on 20 December 2023. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:06 am by sally
High Court (Chancery Division) American Express Services Europe Ltd v HM Revenue & Customs [2010] EWHC 120 (Ch) (29 January 2010) Byers & Ors (Liquidators of Madoff Securities International Ltd) v Yacht Bull Corporation & Anor [2010] EWHC 133 (Ch) (01 February 2010) High Court (Family Division) S (A Child), Re [2010] EWHC B1 (Fam) (04 January 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Hines v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 69… [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:18 am
On March 27, 2015, after a month of trial testimony and three days of deliberations, a California Superior Court jury found that Plaintiff Ellen Pao had not been discriminated against by venture capital firm Defendant Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 4:22 pm by Josh Blackman
Byers, 678-682 Types of Recording Acts, 682-686 Texas Recording Act [read post]