Search for: "Byers v. Byers"
Results 61 - 80
of 97
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2011, 4:00 am
Byers, The Morality of Human Rights, A Secular Ground and Jeffrey M. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 7:15 am
In this week’s case (Byer v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 4:10 pm
The legality of the ban on wearing the Easter lily in Northern Ireland’s prisons has been challenged before the domestic courts on a number of occasions (see Re John Byers [2004] NIQB 23 and In re McCafferty [2008] NIQB 96). [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:58 pm
The ruling in Echols v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 8:30 am
Byers, 2010 Conn. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 1:57 am
The Court also concluded that even if Express's copyright registrations were entitled to a presumptive effect (the main benefit of a US copyright registration), Tower's testimony rebutted that presumption (Folio Impressions v Byer (1991)). [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 9:01 am
Byers, Jr. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
Satellite v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 3:10 am
Byer California v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 11:48 am
Debalinhard v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 2:00 pm
Magic Circle v ‘Lesser’ Firms…. will it ever change? [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 9:27 pm
Allegations that the challenged output ceiling provisions in the partnership agreement were inserted at the defendants' insistence and hampered the IRS's ability to fulfill its goal of increasing electronic filing were directly refuted by the agency the following year, in the Management Response portion of a report issued by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration analyzing the partnership agreement.The decision is Byers v. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 10:54 am
BYERS, APPLIES TO THE REPORTING REQUIREMENT IN CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS INSTRUCTION 5350.4C. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 9:49 am
Oral Argument in case# 09-1833; Freddie Byers, Jr. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 1:19 pm
Byers , applies to the reporting requirement in Chief of Naval Operations Instruction 5350.4C The case of LCDR Matthew Diaz is also set for argument following the Serianne argument. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:08 am
Byers and Others v Yacht Bull Corporation and Another Chancery Division “The court had no jurisdiction to hear a claim by English liquidators to beneficial ownership of a yacht acquired by money from Madoff Securities International Ltd. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 2:09 am
Byers and others v Yacht Bull Corpn and another [2010] EWHC 133 (Ch); [2010] WLR (D) 18 “A claim to beneficial ownership of a yacht did not fall within the exception contained in art 1(2)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters so that the Regulation did not apply to ‘proceedings relating to the winding up of insolvent companies’. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:06 am
High Court (Chancery Division) American Express Services Europe Ltd v HM Revenue & Customs [2010] EWHC 120 (Ch) (29 January 2010) Byers & Ors (Liquidators of Madoff Securities International Ltd) v Yacht Bull Corporation & Anor [2010] EWHC 133 (Ch) (01 February 2010) High Court (Family Division) S (A Child), Re [2010] EWHC B1 (Fam) (04 January 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Hines v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 69… [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 6:11 am
As the Northern District of Illinois observed in the 2002 case of Byers v. [read post]
