Search for: "C. & R. CONSTRUCTION CO. v. Commonwealth" Results 21 - 40 of 51
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (Bancoult No 2) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, heard 22 June 2015. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (Bancoult No 2) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, heard 22 June 2015. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 1:00 am by Aimee Denholm
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (Bancoult No 2) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, heard 22 June 2015. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 12:50 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (C) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 October 2015. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
We would thus be on a fool’s errand not to pay attention to the social construction of reputation, both in terms of how reputations are created and how they are diminished. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 8:05 pm
L. c. 265, § 43A, as interpreted by this Court in Commonwealth v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 7:53 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Sandiford) v The Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, heard 4 June 2014. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 1:58 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Sandiford) v The Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, heard 4 June 2014. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014)Venkatesh Nayak, Programme Coordinator, Access to Information Programme, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative in New Delhi, has requested the circulation of the following essay, entitled "Promulgating Ordinances – Public Scrutiny and Judicial Review. [read post]
6 May 2014, 4:56 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Licciardi Construction Co., 562 A.2d 913, 916 (1989); Janson v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
As with all matters of judicial interpretation, there are matters of nuance and construction. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 6:25 am
Specifically, plaintiff asserted that the Village Zoning law, Chapter IX, Section E was void for vagueness and that the Village Defendants violated his substantive due process rights by denying him a CO. [read post]