Search for: "C. v. C." Results 1 - 20 of 61,130
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2018, 4:05 pm by Kent Scheidegger
C-SPAN's Landmark Cases series will look at Gregg v. [read post]
24 May 2009, 10:31 am
Yes, answers the Court of Justice in its Grand Chamber formation in its judgments in Case C-531/06 Commission v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 3:14 am by Family Law
” Though she didn’t write it, Wynette lived the lyrics of “D-I-V-O-R-C-E,” having been... [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 1:42 am
C v W [2008] EWCA Civ 1459; WLR (D) 4 “There was nothing unreasonable in a simple conditional fee agreement entered into between a claimant and her solicitor when liability had already been admitted by the defendant in the proceedings provided that the parties had made a proper assessment of the inevitably much reduced risk of [...] [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 4:59 am by sally
Nelson and others v Deutsche Lufthansa AG Regina (TUI Travel plc and others) v Civil Aviation Authority (Joined Cases C-581/10–C-629/10); [2012] WLR (D) 293 “Passengers whose flights were delayed were entitled, under certain circumstances, to compensation pursuant to article 5 to 7 of Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied… [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 2:33 pm by Bartolus
Today’s judgment in Joined Cases C-501/06 P, C-513/06 P, C-515/06 P and C-519/06 P GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited (“GSK”) v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 1:27 am by sally
Regina v C [2010] EWCA Crim 2971; [2011] WLR (D) 347 “Where a defendant wished to challenge evidence of earlier convictions which the Crown sought to deploy as relevant to the question of whether the defendant was responsible for the commission of the offences for which he was on trial, the defendant’s bare assertion that he did not commit those earlier offences was inadequate; it was essential that the defendant provide a detailed defence statement identifying all the… [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 5:55 am by Unreported Opinions
Worsham (“Worsham”), appellant, filed a complaint against Raymond C. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 9:02 pm
A while ago we noted the Court of Justice's judgment in Joined Cases C-120/06 P and C-121/06 P FIAMM and FIAMM Technologies v Council and Commission. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 8:02 am by admin
  Carl and Cathy’s Jeep suffered no-starts, suspension issues, body and structural problems, electronic issues, and additional serious non-conformities […] The post Carl and Cathy C. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 8:09 am by admin
When Sarah requested that […] The post Sarah C. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 2:41 am
R v C [2009] UKHL 42; [2009] WLR (D) 272 “The words of s 30(2)(a) of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 ‘or for any other reason’ were wide enough to include an irrational fear preventing the free exercise of choice, and inability to communicate the choice made within s 30(2)(b) was not limited to physical inability. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 6:19 am
This judgment is largely similar to that in C-404/05, Commission v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 2:43 am
Stringer and Others v HM Revenue and Customs; Schultz-Hoff v Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund Joined Cases C-520/06 and C-350/06 Court of Justice of the European Communities “Workers or former workers who in a particular year were on sick leave and for that reason were unable to exercise their right to paid annual leave in that year, were entitled [...] [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:30 am
Stringer and others v HM Revenue and Customs (Case C-520/06); Schultz-Hoff v Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund (Case C-350/06); [2009] WLR (D) 13 “Employees who by reason of illness were not able to take paid annual leave in the year in which it was due were not for that reason to be deprived of the right to paid [...] [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 2:22 am
Sturgeon and others v Condor Flugdienst GmbH (Case C-402/07); Böck and another v Air France SA (Case C-432/07) [2009] WLR (D) 338 "Airline passengers whose flights were delayed by more than three hours were entitled to compensation. [read post]