Search for: "C. v. C." Results 21 - 40 of 61,854
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2021, 8:45 am by D Daniel Sokol
Cases C-466/19 P Qualcomm and C-481/19 P DB v Consob Marc Veenbrink Judgment of 28 January 2021, Qualcomm v Commission, C-466/19P, EU:C:2021:76, and Judgment of 2 February 2021, DB v Commissione Nazionale per le... [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:15 am
The recent Court of Appeal decision in C v W [2008] EWCA Civ 1459 was concerned with a CFA with a success fee that was entered into after liability had been admitted by the Defendant's insurers. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:01 am
You may recall that in the summer of 2005 in another Commission v Council case, C- [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 7:47 am by Peter
Joe Kristan tells of  a recent Tax Court case (Gaffney v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 1:31 am
R v T; R v B; R v C; R v H [2009] EWCA Crim 1035; [2009] WLR (D) 19 “A criminal trial without a jury did not contravene a defendant's right to a fair trial where there was a real danger of jury tampering and proposed measures to prevent such interference did not sufficiently address [...] [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 2:25 am by sally
Regina (GC) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis; Regina (C) v Same [2010] WLR (D) 193 “When it was not possible to reconcile a decision of the House of Lords in relation to the proportionality and legitimacy of the indefinite retention on the United Kingdom’s Police National Computer of biometric data obtained in the course of criminal investigations with a subsequent holding by the European Court of Human Rights that the policy was unlawful, the… [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 7:00 am by Alex Nealon
Capital C Infringement of Capitol Records EMI April Music Inc. v. 4MM Games, LLC, 2014 WL 1383468 United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Memorandum Opinion […] [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 2:26 am
Regina v I (C) and others; [2009] WLR (D) 286 “A judge who had conducted the case management of a long or complex case, whether or not as a preparatory hearing, had to conduct the trial in that case unless there were sufficiently compelling cause to depart from that rule. [read post]