Search for: "C. v. C." Results 41 - 60 of 61,827
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2010, 3:26 am by traceydennis
C v D and another [2010] EWHC 2940 (Ch); [2010] WLR (D) 292 “A time-limited offer was not capable of being an offer within the meaning of CPR Pt 36, which established that an offer must be capable of acceptance unless and until withdrawn by service of a notice within CPR r 36.9(2). [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 8:42 pm
Orin Kerr writes on Volokh Conspiracy: C-SPAN Washington Journal on Kentucky v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 2:38 am by sally
Regina v B (F); Same v P (A); Same v C (J) [2010] EWCA Crim 1857; [2010] WLR (D) 21 “A judge sitting in the Crown Court had no power to quash an indictment simply because he did not believe that the proceedings were appropriately brought or were not in the public interest when compared with his assessment of the needs of other cases and that had not changed as a result of the introduction of the Criminal Procedure Rules 2010. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 7:00 am by Alex Nealon
Capital C Infringement of Capitol Records EMI April Music Inc. v. 4MM Games, LLC, 2014 WL 1383468 United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Memorandum Opinion […] [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:57 am by sally
Interflora Inc and another v Marks & Spencer plc (Case C-323/09); [2011] WLR (D) 281 “Article 5(1)(a) of First Council Directive 89/104/EEC and article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark was to be interpreted as meaning that the proprietor of a trade mark was entitled to prevent a competitor from advertising on the basis of a keyword which was identical with the trade mark and which had been selected in an internet referencing service… [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 1:43 pm by Allard Knook
The Court held that that the procedure established under Art. 259 TFEU was designed to obtain a declaration that the conduct of a Member State was in breach of EU law and to terminate that conduct (see, to that effect, Joined Cases 15/76 and 16/76 France v Commission [1979]; Case C-456/05 Commission v Germany [2007]; and Joined Cases C-514/07 P, C-528/07 P and C-532/07 P Sweden and Others v API and Commission [2010]).Thus, as the aim of… [read post]
5 May 2021, 11:30 am by D Daniel Sokol
Clarifying the Enforceability of Jurisdiction Clauses for Private Actions of Competition Law: Case C-59/19 Wikingerhof (Case C-59/19 Wikingerhof v Booking.com, EU:C:2020:950) Pauline Le More Legal actions initiated before the court of the place where the damage caused by the alleged... [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:12 am
Section 207-c administrative hearingsDoolittle v Broome County, 276 AD2d 863The Doolittle case involves a relatively unique issue: a hearing officer conducting a Section 207-c hearing* deciding the duration of a workplace stress situation that the employee claimed was the cause of her work-connected disability.Rita Doolittle, a Broome County correction officer, claimed that she had suffered a disability as a result of work-related stress. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 6:20 pm
Now, the Court of Justice has addressed the issue in Joined Cases C-120/06 P and C-121/06 P FIAMM and FIAMM Technologies v Council and Commission. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 2:23 am by sally
Realchemie Nederland BV v Bayer CropScience AG (Case C-406/09); [2011] WLR (D) 350 “Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p1) applied to the recognition and enforcement of a decision of a court or tribunal that contained an order to pay a fine in order to ensure compliance with a judgment given in a civil and commercial matter. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:23 am by Mary Whisner
Landmark Cases: Historic Supreme Court Decisions will run live on C-SPAN Monday evenings (9 pm ET is 6 pm here), Oct. 5 to Dec. 21. [read post]