Search for: "C. v. C." Results 61 - 80 of 61,857
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2017, 7:08 pm by Injury at Sea
F/V Deceptive C grounded in Stikine Strait, approximately 17 nautical miles from Wrangell, Monday evening. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 9:03 am by Kenan Farrell
However, donations to a 501(c)(6) are not tax deductible as charitable contributions, as is the case with a 501(c)(3). [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 5:00 am by D Daniel Sokol
Judgment in Case C-607/18P—NKT v Commission: Procedural Rights … and Wrongs in Cartel Proceedings Jacob Borum The Court of Justice of the EU, set aside part of the judgment of the General Court, based on inconsistency between the statement of... [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 12:00 am by D Daniel Sokol
Helmut Brokelmann and Mariarosaria Ganino ask C-449/14 P DTS v Commission: When is a Tax Measure State Aid? [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 3:47 am by sally
“Alex Verdan QC and Charles Hale, both of 4 Paper Buildings, counsel for the father in A v B and C, consider the lessons that can be learned by practitioners from the Court of Appeal judgment.” Full story Family Law Week, 5th April 2012 Source: www.familylawweek.com [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:03 am
Regina( C) v Secretary of State for Justice; [2008] WLR (D) 262 “The introduction of an amendment to the Secure Training Centre Rules to permit physical restraint of young offenders in secure training centres to ensure good order and discipline without prior consultation with the Children's Commissioner was unlawful and engaged art 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedom. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 8:34 am
Regina (C) v Secretary of State for Justice Court of Appeal “Secondary legislation laid before Parliament three weeks after a report sent by the Youth Justice Board to the directors of privatised secure training centres holding children, following two deaths in custody, was quashed as procedurally flawed and in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
29 May 2007, 2:51 am
Civil search order discloses potential criminal liability C plc and Another v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:23 am
Freeport plc v Arnoldsson (Case C-98/06) “The fact that claims brought against a number of defendants had different legal bases did not preclude application of the provision in art 6(1) of Regulation 44/2001 (the successor to the Brussels Convention of 1968) that in certain circumstances multiple defendants could be sued in the courts of the domicile of any of them. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 2:26 am
Mayr v Backerei und Konditorei Gerhard Flockner OHG Case C-506/06 Court of Justice of the European Communities “The dismissal of a female employee when her ova had been fertilised in an in vitro procedure but had not yet been transferred into her uterus was not prohibited by the Community directive on the safety and health of pregnant workers, but was prohibited by the equal treatment directive it if was established that the dismissal was based on the fact that she had… [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 2:02 am by sally
Rodríguez and Others v Air France SA (Case C-83/10); [2011] WLR (D) 348 “‘Cancellation’, in article 2(1) of Parliament and Council Regulation 261/2004/EC was not limited to the situation in which an aeroplane failed to take off at all, but also covered the case in which it took off but, for whatever reason, was subsequently forced to return to the airport of departure where the passengers were transferred to other flights. ‘Further compensation’… [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:34 am by sally
Williams and others v British Airways plc (Case C-155/10); [2011] WLR (D) 282 “An airline pilot was entitled, during his annual leave, not only to the maintenance of his basic salary, but also, first, to all the components intrinsically linked to the performance of the tasks which he was required to carry out under his contract of employment and in respect of which a monetary amount, included in the calculation of his total remuneration, was provided and, second, to all the… [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 12:30 am by Emmanuel Barthe
Même la chaîne Public Sénat ne dit qu'une partie de la vérité . [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 5:48 am by Tim Zinnecker
C-SPAN begins a twelve-part television series on landmark Supreme Court decisions next week, kicking off with Marbury v. [read post]