Search for: "CALIFORNIA v. NEVADA." Results 241 - 260 of 1,232
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2020, 11:54 am by David Super
  Indeed, if anything the momentum is away from holding a convention as four states – Delaware, Maryland, Nevada, and New Mexico – rescinded decades-old resolutions calling for an Article V convention. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 5:21 am by James Romoser
National Association of African American-Owned Media and Babb v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
But rounding out the top five for outmigration were New York, Massachusetts, South Carolina, and California—not, with the exception of South Carolina, a list of low-tax locales. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:48 am by GPMfeeds
LOS ANGELES–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP (“GPM”) announces that it has filed a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada captioned Chowdhury v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:17 am by Josh H. Escovedo
However, such rights and enforcement mechanisms won’t protect a trademark user in California from a party using a confusingly similar trademark in a neighboring state like Nevada or Oregon. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 10:26 am by Kevin Kaufman
The Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
31 May 2020, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
The Cost of Privacy: Welfare Effect of the Disclosure of Covid-19 Cases, NBER Working Paper No. w27220, David Argente, Pennsylvania State University, Chang-Tai Hsieh, University of Chicago – Booth School of Business; University of California, Berkeley – Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Munseob Lee, University of California, San Diego (UCSD). [read post]
26 May 2020, 8:00 am by FHH Law
Filers that submit Form 395 can satisfy this requirement by completing Section V of Form 395 and need not submit a separate report. [read post]
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”) issued on April 16, 2020 two orders[1] largely denying requests for rehearing of its prior decisions that, among other things, subjected to minimum offer price thresholds energy resources participating in PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. [read post]