Search for: "CALIFORNIA v. WASHINGTON"
Results 81 - 100
of 4,503
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2017, 9:45 pm
Conway was a case of first impression in California, however the appellate court considered the other states that found replacement costs can include purchase of another building at a different location, namely Connecticut, Alabama, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, Maine, and Washington.3 The court noted in particular, that in the case of Hess v. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 3:46 pm
California (Washington Law Review, Vol. 90, 2015, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 8:13 am
It's via the Washington Post. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:45 am
”[7] Citing a California Court of Appeal decision,Haskel, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm
In Part I of this series, I discussed three critical errors in the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Washington v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 8:03 am
The Washington Post, what one wag dubbed Rakofsky v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 7:09 am
Following this decision, courts in Washington have rejected a slew of cases, including many filed by Gordon himself. [read post]
22 Jan 2003, 9:21 am
The California Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League has posted a special Roe. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 8:40 pm
In The Campbell Pet Co. v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 7:08 pm
There was extensive coverage of, and a variety of reactions to, the Court’s decision today in Brown v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:31 pm
The court compared the case to a nearly identical California law upheld in the case of Pickup v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:22 am
” Wilson v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 12:07 pm
How about a consumer request under one of the recently-enacted privacy statutes (of either California or Washington)? [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 9:57 am
It’s been nearly 10 years since plaintiff in Camicia v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 3:45 pm
Reliance on the California case Leighton v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 8:12 am
Trademark infringement lawsuit - which was originally filed in Washington - was transferred to the Central District of California - Santa Ana Division, pursuant to stipulation by the parties' attorneys. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
In Pickup v. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 1:32 pm
Decided December 31, 2008 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 12:26 pm
If a Washingtonian flew to California, picked up a rental car, and drove around San Diego, there’s no way that Washington could say that the driver owes the state VMT taxes simply because they’re a Washington resident, since the taxable activity has no nexus with Washington even though the person does. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 5:35 pm
California (2008), as previously in Crawford v. [read post]
