Search for: "CANFIELD v. CANFIELD" Results 1 - 20 of 61
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2010, 3:44 am
Termination for cause may result in the loss of fringe benefits in retirementFarrell v City of Rensselaer, NYS Supreme Court, Justice James B. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 7:48 am by Dan Bressler
Keeping an eye on his voluminous site of cites, I note several interesting updates: Current Client (posted July 15, 2020) Canfield v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:43 am
To establish an attorney-client relationship there must be an explicit undertaking to perform a specific task (see Wei Cheng Chang v Pi, 288 AD2d 378; Volpe v Canfield, 237 AD2d at 283). [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 4:32 am
To establish an attorney-client relationship there must be an explicit undertaking to perform a specific task (see Wei Cheng Chang v Pi, 288 AD2d 378, 733 N.Y.S.2d 471; Volpe v Canfield, 237 AD2d at 283). [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:30 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Cooley is represented by the Miller Canfield law firm and the anonymous blogger, using the pseudonym "Rockstar05", is represented by Berkeley, MI attorney John Hermann.For their part, Miller Canfield has been vigorously prosecuting their cause of action, issuing subpoenas in two states [Michigan and California] to the Rockstar05's Internet service provider, seeking to rip the lid off the blogger's identity.In September and October, hearings were conducted on… [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 2:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
"To prevail in a legal malpractice action, a plaintiff must show that the attorney “failed to exercise that degree of care, skill, and diligence commonly possessed and exercised by a member of the legal community” (Volpe v Canfield, 237 AD2d 282,283  that such negligence was the proximate cause of their damages, and that, but for the attorney’s negligence, the plaintiff would have prevailed oh the underlying claim (see Rau v , Borenkoff, 262… [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 2:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
"To prevail in a legal malpractice action, a plaintiff must show that the attorney “failed to exercise that degree of care, skill, and diligence commonly possessed and exercised by a member of the legal community” (Volpe v Canfield, 237 AD2d 282,283 that such negligence was the proximate cause of their damages, and that, but for the attorney’s negligence, the plaintiff would have prevailed oh the underlying claim (see Rau v , Borenkoff, 262 AD2d 388.… [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
"To prevail in a legal malpractice action, a plaintiff must show that the attorney “failed to exercise that degree of care, skill, and diligence commonly possessed and exercised by a member of the legal community” (Volpe v Canfield, 237 AD2d 282,283 that such negligence was the proximate cause of their damages, and that, but for the attorney’s negligence, the plaintiff would have prevailed oh the underlying claim (see Rau v , Borenkoff, 262 AD2d 388.… [read post]