Search for: "CANFIELD v. STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 38
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2010, 3:44 am
Termination for cause may result in the loss of fringe benefits in retirementFarrell v City of Rensselaer, NYS Supreme Court, Justice James B. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:43 am
To establish an attorney-client relationship there must be an explicit undertaking to perform a specific task (see Wei Cheng Chang v Pi, 288 AD2d 378; Volpe v Canfield, 237 AD2d at 283). [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:30 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Cooley is represented by the Miller Canfield law firm and the anonymous blogger, using the pseudonym "Rockstar05", is represented by Berkeley, MI attorney John Hermann.For their part, Miller Canfield has been vigorously prosecuting their cause of action, issuing subpoenas in two states [Michigan and California] to the Rockstar05's Internet service provider, seeking to rip the lid off the blogger's identity.In September and October, hearings were… [read post]
31 May 2023, 6:42 am by Dan Bressler
’ Similarly, MTTP alleged that Miller Canfield falsely stated that it never represented the municipal insurance program. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 7:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
However, her Title VII claim against the Assistant Secretary of State in his official capacity, as well as her Section 1983 and state law claims, were dismissed because of Eleventh Amendment immunity (Canfield v. [read post]
29 May 2022, 12:27 pm by privacylawyer
In his view, this is best achieved through the established test in R v Collins, [1987] 1 SCR 265, 308. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:12 am by Joy Waltemath
However, her Title VII claim against the Assistant Secretary of State in his official capacity, as well as her Section 1983 and state law claims, were dismissed because of Eleventh Amendment immunity (Canfield v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 6:10 am
 Zahorik v State, 2015 WL 5042105 (Fourteenth Court of Appeals of Texas 2015). [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 9:46 am
 Moreover, for the purposes of residency, a “resident is one who lives in the household with a certain degree of permanency and intention to remain” Canfield v Peerless Ins. [read post]