Search for: "CARLILE v. STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2012, 12:07 am by INFORRM
In R (Lord Carlile of Berriew CBE QC and others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 617 (Admin), the Divisional Court upheld, with evident reluctance, the Home Secretary’s decision to exclude Maryam Rajavi, “an eminent dissident Iranian politician”, from the UK – denying her the opportunity from meeting in the Palace of Westminster with 16 prominent cross-party members of the House of Lords and the House of Commons to discuss… [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 2:36 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
She replied in February 2011 stating that she had concluded that Mrs Rajavi’s admission to the UK would not be conducive to the public good. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 8:35 am by Samantha Knights, Matrix
The Claimants had a number of high profile witnesses (including Lord Carlile, a former Home Secretary and former PUC) who contended that the concerns of the Secretary of State were at best exaggerated and not justified either by history or by the experience of other European states. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 11:28 am by Rosalind English
Lord Carlile and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department – read judgment The High Court has upheld an order by the Home Secretary preventing Maryam Rajavi, a prominent Iranian dissident, from speaking in Parliament. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 am by GuestPost
  In fact, it was not until the report published in 2010 that Carlile explicitly stated that section 44 in its present form should not continue in operation (Carlile Report on 2009, para 268). [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 2:46 am by ASAD KHAN
As demonstrated by Mamatkulov v Turkey (2005) 41 EHRR 25, DFAL’s criterion of serious irreversible harm shows some intersection with the ECtHR’s application of rule 39 relief. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:42 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) R. v SVS Solicitors [2012] EWCA Crim 319 (15 February 2012) A v B & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 285 (14 March 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Maqsood v Mahmood & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 251 (13 March 2012) JD (Congo) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 327 (16 March 2012) Barr & Ors v Biffa Waste Services Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 312 (19 March 2012) High Court… [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 1:42 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
In addition to the key case of Rottmann v Freistaat Bayern [2010] ECR I-1449 numerous other authorities such as Kaur [2001] All ER (EC) 250, McCarthy [2011] All ER (EC) 729 Zambrano [2011] ECR I-1177 and Dereci [2011] ECR I-11315 were analysed and applied to his case. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 1:31 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
19 May 2014, 1:42 am by Jocelyn Hutton
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 1:37 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:45 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD; the Court ruled by a 4-1 majority that the executive’s decision to bar Mrs Rajavi’s admission into the UK on grounds that it would not be conducive to the public good was rational and Secretary of State had not underrated the appellants’ ECHR, art 10 rights or overstated the risk. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:22 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 7:53 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 12:03 pm
Enterprises Ltd v. [read post]