Search for: "CASTILLO v. STATE" Results 201 - 220 of 240
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2009, 12:16 pm
People v Castillo, 1331, 3751/00, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2009 NY Slip Op 7760; 886 N.Y.S.2d 805; 2009 N.Y. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 5:03 am
The Associated Press State & Local Wire,  August 6, 2009 Thursday 11:58 PM GMT,  ,  STATE AND REGIONAL,  280 words,  Community cleans up Buffalo street where 5 shot,  BUFFALO N.Y.... [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 9:19 am
Entergy: Same Judgment, Divergent Opinions In Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 1:18 pm
This segment summarizes state-of-the art knowledge of the pros and cons (advantages and limitations) of using ionizing radiation to enhance the quality of fresh iceberg lettuce and spinach. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 11:54 pm
Additionally, respected public health organizations worldwide have reviewed the data, and every major group has stated that food irradiation is a potential tool to protect the public health. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm
Alexander, No. 071780 In a conviction for sale of controlled substance in or near school grounds, denial of writ of habeas corpus is affirmed over claims that the state courts unreasonably applied Batson v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
State of Tennessee, No. 06-6208 In civil rights suit alleging that city police discriminated against plaintiffs in violation of the Ame [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
8 May 2008, 1:13 pm
In late September, the Supreme Court had agreed to hear the case Baze v. [read post]