Search for: "CASTILLO v. STATE"
Results 61 - 80
of 308
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
BECAUSE WE HAVE THE POWER TO FUCK OUR CLIENTS - The Jefferson Parish Indigent Defender Board Edition
1 Feb 2011, 1:45 pm
Castillo then asked the Court of Appeal, which looked at cases from the United States Supreme Court (Williams v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 5:30 am
Castillo v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 1:31 am
U.S. v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 1:49 pm
” Castillo, 804 F.3d at 367 (quoting United States v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 2:57 am
Lecat’s Ventriloscope v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:22 am
Three published criminal opinions yesterday -- 1) United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 6:19 pm
Castillo, 80 N.Y.2d 578, 587, (N.Y. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 8:00 am
The appeals panel in conclusion stated that most of its decisions were based, either explicitly or implicitly, on the strategic choices made by plaintiff’s counsel in the trial court. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 8:10 am
Additionally, Meachum found that the Doe v. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:53 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 8:30 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 6:10 pm
Saying that it is reluctantly applying Castillo v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 8:00 pm
Below, Alexandra Lampert of Stanford Law School recaps Monday’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 2:29 pm
Whitfield v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:18 am
Previously, Judge Castillo too rejected Fifield’s bright-line test in Montel Aetnastak, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 8:01 am
See United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 7:00 am
See Castillo v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:59 am
Judge Holderman declined to follow the lead of Chief Judge Castillo in Montel Aetnastak, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 8:25 am
United States or, notoriously, Bush v. [read post]
