Search for: "CASTRO v. STATE"
Results 21 - 40
of 438
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2023, 6:36 am
Ruiz, Jr. was the first Hispanic attorney to argue before the United States Supreme Court in Buck v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 2:22 pm
Castro-Huerta that “Indian country is part of the State, not separate from the State” is a reminder of tribal sovereignty’s precarious foundation under U.S. law. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 6:47 pm
But to be effective these ought to focus on targeted states rather than on the modalities of leading state self-actualization. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:18 pm
Already in Florida, one case has been tossed out and is on appeal before the 11th Circuit (Castro v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 1:36 pm
Harpe (McGirt v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 3:17 pm
Oklahoma; Self Defense) United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 1:13 pm
But two years later, the Supreme Court ruled in McGirt v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 3:47 am
In 2017 the 10th Circuit held in Murphy v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 3:41 am
Castro-Huerta, respectively. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm
Solemn vow: Solum's originalism, treaties, and tribal sovereignty in Castro-Huerta. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:42 pm
Castro-Huerta: A new era of Indian law? [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 8:34 pm
Castro-Huerta. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 9:53 am
Facts: This case (Miller v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 3:42 am
Castro-Huerta that a state may prosecute a non-Indian for a crime committed against an Indian within Indian country. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 4:40 pm
—John Erskine 1Castro v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 3:20 pm
Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 2:42 pm
Surviving Castro-Huerta: The historical perseverance of the basic policy of Worcester v. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 5:31 am
Rusco has posted “Oklahoma v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 3:56 am
LaVelle has published Surviving Castro-Huerta: The Historical Perseverance of the Basic Policy of Worcester v. [read post]
