Search for: "CHANCELLOR v. PHILLIPS" Results 21 - 39 of 39
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On the Centre for Law, Justice and Journalism blog, Alex Antoniou analyses the recent decision in R v Peacock. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 11:53 pm by INFORRM
On 15 December 2011 the Court of Appeal (The Chancellor, Laws and Rafferty LJJ) will give judgment in the case of Berzevoksy v Terluk, (heard 1, 2 and 3 November 2011). [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:30 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday 1 November 2011 the Court of Appeal (Chancellor, Laws and Rafferty LJJ) will hear the appeal in Berezovksy v Terluk. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm by Charon QC
There appears, however, to be some form of ‘aggressive tax avoidance’ which chancellor Osborne and prime minister Cameron regard as ‘morally repugnant’. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
: On August 19, 2013, in connection with its entry into a settlement with New York-based hedge fund adviser Phillip Falcone and his advisory firm Harbinger Capital Partners, the SEC for the first time implemented its new policy requiring defendants seeking to settle civil enforcement actions to admit wrongdoing, in contrast to the long-standing practice of allowing defendants to resolve the enforcement actions with a “neither-admit-nor-deny” settlement. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
On 15 December 2011 the Court of Appeal (The Chancellor, Laws and Rafferty LJJ) gave judgment in the case of Terluk v Berezovsky [2011] EWCA Civ 1534 (heard 1, 2 and 3 November 2011). [read post]
2 May 2011, 12:00 am by 1 Crown Office Row
The trial judges in Campbell v MGN and Douglas v Hello! [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
We have had previous posts on the cases of Robins v Kordowski [2011] EWHC 981 (QB)) (seehere), Awdry, Bailey and Douglas v Kordowksi, Farrall v Kordowksi [2010] EWHC 2436 (QB) (see here), Phillips v Kordowski and Mazzola v Kordowski. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:20 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The PCC also published the following “resolved” cases on 25 November: Sir Alan Davies Daily Mail, Clause 10; Kenneth Brewster The Sun, Clause 1; Adam Bradford The Star (Sheffield), Clause 1; Karen Coleman Brentwood Gazette, Clause 1; CLEAR The Sun, Clause 1; Mrs Maria Blamires Daily Mail, Clause 5; Mrs Maria Blamires Daily Mirror, Clause 5; Lord Triesman The Mail on Sunday, Clauses 1, 3 and 10; Resolved – London Borough of Sutton v Sutton [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 8:41 am by Roy Black
Jones) or third party business records (US v. [read post]
  Most recently of all, in Nicklinson (Nicklinson and Lamb v the United Kingdom), the ECtH [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:41 am by Charon QC
I’m  not a family lawyer – but Natasha Phillips is and her Researching Reform blog often ‘Questions it’ and provides insight into the rights and wrongs of our family justice system. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:49 am by CMS
Today’s live blog team comprises Kenneth Rose, Stephen Phillips, Rory Thomson, Morag McClelland, Shona McCusker, Sian McNiff, Tobias Seger and Emma Boffey, all from CMS Scotland. 1604: That ends proceedings for today. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm by familoo
Rule 27.9 requires a recording to be made of a hearing in open court of proceedings pending in the High Court, and in other proceedings at the Lord Chancellor’s direction. [read post]