Search for: "CHANCELLOR v. PHILLIPS"
Results 21 - 40
of 44
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2011, 5:02 pm
The panel will be Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 12:37 am
As Lord Burrows pointed out at [5], in the Christian Brothers case – Catholic Child Welfare Society & Ors v Various Claimants & The Institute of the Brothers of the Christian Schools & Ors [2012] UKSC 5 – Lord Phillips had said at [19] that the law of vicarious liability was “on the move”. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:30 am
The Chancellor of the High Court has now assigned Mr Justice Vos to deal with all the “News of the World” telephone interception cases. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 5:28 pm
The trial judge in Campbell v MGN was Mr Justice Morland since retired and in Douglas v Hello! [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
On the Centre for Law, Justice and Journalism blog, Alex Antoniou analyses the recent decision in R v Peacock. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 11:53 pm
On 15 December 2011 the Court of Appeal (The Chancellor, Laws and Rafferty LJJ) will give judgment in the case of Berzevoksy v Terluk, (heard 1, 2 and 3 November 2011). [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:30 am
On Tuesday 1 November 2011 the Court of Appeal (Chancellor, Laws and Rafferty LJJ) will hear the appeal in Berezovksy v Terluk. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm
There appears, however, to be some form of ‘aggressive tax avoidance’ which chancellor Osborne and prime minister Cameron regard as ‘morally repugnant’. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Alison Phillips & Catherine Beatrice Phillips eds., Cambridge Univ. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:38 am
: On August 19, 2013, in connection with its entry into a settlement with New York-based hedge fund adviser Phillip Falcone and his advisory firm Harbinger Capital Partners, the SEC for the first time implemented its new policy requiring defendants seeking to settle civil enforcement actions to admit wrongdoing, in contrast to the long-standing practice of allowing defendants to resolve the enforcement actions with a “neither-admit-nor-deny” settlement. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
On 15 December 2011 the Court of Appeal (The Chancellor, Laws and Rafferty LJJ) gave judgment in the case of Terluk v Berezovsky [2011] EWCA Civ 1534 (heard 1, 2 and 3 November 2011). [read post]
2 May 2011, 12:00 am
The trial judges in Campbell v MGN and Douglas v Hello! [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:07 pm
The trial judges in Campbell v MGN and Douglas v Hello! [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm
We have had previous posts on the cases of Robins v Kordowski [2011] EWHC 981 (QB)) (seehere), Awdry, Bailey and Douglas v Kordowksi, Farrall v Kordowksi [2010] EWHC 2436 (QB) (see here), Phillips v Kordowski and Mazzola v Kordowski. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
In Berkoff v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:20 pm
Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm
The PCC also published the following “resolved” cases on 25 November: Sir Alan Davies Daily Mail, Clause 10; Kenneth Brewster The Sun, Clause 1; Adam Bradford The Star (Sheffield), Clause 1; Karen Coleman Brentwood Gazette, Clause 1; CLEAR The Sun, Clause 1; Mrs Maria Blamires Daily Mail, Clause 5; Mrs Maria Blamires Daily Mirror, Clause 5; Lord Triesman The Mail on Sunday, Clauses 1, 3 and 10; Resolved – London Borough of Sutton v Sutton [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
Phillips Gold & Co., LLP v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 8:41 am
Jones) or third party business records (US v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 1:00 am
Most recently of all, in Nicklinson (Nicklinson and Lamb v the United Kingdom), the ECtH [read post]
