Search for: "CHRISTIAN HUGHES v. THE STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 91
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2013, 2:20 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The Court stated that its judgment does not favour sexual orientation over religious belief – had the respondents refused rooms to the appellants because of their Christian beliefs, the appellants would have been equally protected by the prohibition of discrimination. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 2:20 am by Matrix LegalĀ  Information Team
The Court stated that its judgment does not favour sexual orientation over religious belief – had the respondents refused rooms to the appellants because of their Christian beliefs, the appellants would have been equally protected by the prohibition of discrimination. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Babie & Joshua Neoh, A Statement on Inclusive Law and Religion, (39 Adelaide Law Review 203 (2018).David Hughes, The United States Embassy in Jerusalem: Does Location Matter? [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 5:54 am
Noyes, reviewing The Sources of International Law, by Hugh Thirlway [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 5:53 am by Howard Friedman
I, Sec. 16 of the Virginia Constitution that refers to "the duty which we owe to our Creator" and  "Christian forbearance" forces him to worship against his conscience and makes Christianity the official state religion. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 7:24 pm
Shaw; and The International Court of Justice, by Hugh Thirlway Jochen A. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:58 am by Frank Cranmer
Supreme Court In Christian Institute & Ors v Lord Advocate (Scotland) [2016] UKSC 51, the appellants sought judicial review of Part 4, averring that it was outwith the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament under the Scotland Act 1998 because it related to matters reserved to the UK Parliament, that it was incompatible with ECHR rights and/or that it was incompatible with EU law. [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
 The question is not whether some readers would have misunderstood the satire as stating facts but whether the average or reasonable reader would have come to that view. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Hughes v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 4:44 am by Karen Tani
Rachel Shelden, Penn State University, has won the Hughes-Gossett Award of the Supreme Court Historical Society for the best article published in the Journal of Supreme Court History, “Anatomy of a Presidential Campaign from the Supreme Court Bench: John McLean, Levi Woodbury, and the Election of 1848” (Penn State).At 1 PM on July 17, the Supreme Court Historical Society will host a virtual conversation between Helen Knowles-Gardner and Dennis J. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 7:12 am by Eric Goldman
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am by Francisco Macías
  On appeal to the supreme court of the state, the judgment was affirmed [. . .].'” 1921—Kirby v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 7:11 am by Eric Goldman
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 10:46 am by Eric Goldman
New Destiny Christian Center * Court Orders Rightsowner to Withdraw DMCA Takedown Notices Sent to Amazon–Beyond Blond v. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 8:18 am by Eric Goldman
New Destiny Christian Center * Court Orders Rightsowner to Withdraw DMCA Takedown Notices Sent to Amazon–Beyond Blond v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 1:24 am by Anthony Fairclough
On the transfer of liability question, Hughes LJ rejected the managers’ argument that the in order to “subsist” for the purpose of the Secretary of State’s Order that the potential liability must have been “known” by the managers at the time of the Order. [read post]