Search for: "CO Honeycutt" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2016, 4:32 pm by Elizabeth Lowman
At issue is whether one co-conspirator in a drug deal is liable for forfeiting all of the reasonably foreseeable proceeds from the deal. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 8:23 pm by Kate Howard
The petition of the day is: Honeycutt v. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 3:02 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Issue summary is from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: Honeycutt v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 7:34 pm by Rory Little
That theory is an application of the federal Pinkerton rule, which permits conspirators to be convicted for the foreseeable crimes of their co-conspirators. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 6:55 am by Daniel Cappetta
“Terry Michael Honeycutt [the petitioner here] managed sales and inventory for a … hardware store owned by his brother, Tony Honeycutt. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
On Friday, the court added one case to its merits docket, granting cert in Honeycutt v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:56 am by Amy Howe
Last week, the justices added one new case from that conference to their merits docket for the term: Honeycutt v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 8:00 am by Aurora Barnes
§ 981(a)(1)(C) authorizes forfeiture imposed jointly and severally among co-conspirators, as the U.S. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 8:33 am by Andrew Hamm
United States, in which the justices ruled that co-conspirators who do not benefit personally from illegal proceeds cannot be ordered to forfeit property. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:20 am by John Elwood
§ 853(a)(1) mandates joint and several liability among co-conspirators for forfeiture of the reasonably foreseeable proceeds of a drug conspiracy. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 2:54 pm by Amy Howe
The justices had already granted review in one case from that conference, Honeycutt v. [read post]