Search for: "CONTINENTAL CAS. CO. v. WEAR" Results 1 - 2 of 2
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2009, 11:23 pm
Rather, we conclude that the exclusion in question is ambiguous and thus should be construed in favor of plaintiffs, the insureds (see generally White v Continental Cas. [read post]