Search for: "COOK v. STATE INDUSTRIAL COURT" Results 1 - 20 of 408
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2013, 2:47 am by Dr Jeremias Prassl
Wider Implications The proceedings in Hook v British Airways and Stott v Thomas Cook have already attracted significant attention from the Equality and Human Rights Commission; with the Secretary of State acting as a further intervener. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am by Dr Jeremias Prassl
‘Exposing a Grave Injustice’: Montreal Exclusivity and the Rights of Disabled Passengers On March 5, 2014 the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in Stott v Thomas Cook (previewed for the UK Supreme Court blog last autumn here). [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 4:51 am
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., Defendant (Complaint, United States District Court for the... [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm by Carl Custer
When Michael Taylor declared Escherichia coli O157:H7 an adulterant in ground beef, there were howls of, “Just cook it,” from the industry and from within FSIS. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:59 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Colvin, March 18, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit More Blog Entries: Dimmett v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:55 pm by admin
In a 7-0 decision, the Illinois Supreme Court recently upheld legislation that will allow video gaming in the state for the first time. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 5:19 pm by Kerry Shapiro
The court’s ruling essentially invalidates SWRCB’s nearly two-decade-long effort to fill the gap left by the shrinking scope of regulation under the federal Clean Water Act following the Supreme Court’s 2001 decision in Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Cty. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:38 pm by Bill Marler
The Court agrees with the Plaintiffs that this decision may have a substantial impact on the regulated industry. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 2:17 pm by Robert Kreisman
The Illinois Appellate Court has affirmed a ruling by a Cook County associate judge who denied a forum non conveniens challenge brought by Motorola in Joseph Erwin, Jr., et al. v. [read post]