Search for: "COPE v. COPE" Results 121 - 140 of 1,019
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2020, 2:22 pm by Giles Peaker
Escott, R (On the application of) v Chichester District Council (2020) EWHC 1687 (Admin) A judicial review where the relevant parts played out in the early stages of the pandemic lockdown, and where the central question was whether self contained accommodation provided without a fridge, cooker and bed, was suitable within the meaning of section 206 Housing Act 1996, such that interim relief could be ordered. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 2:20 am by familoo
v=IPFExoEL_20&feature=youtu.be Official blurb below… How has lockdown affected the Family Court? [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 11:05 am by Kevin Kaufman
Last Tuesday, the Aspen Institute published a white paper arguing in support of an expanded “Pandemic” Earned Income Tax Credit as a way to help workers cope through the COVID-19 outbreak. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Yuanyou (Sunny) Yang
Regulatory language has yet to be published, leaving a lot of uncertainties, particularly for small businesses as the country is still coping with the massive impact of COVID-19. [read post]
27 May 2020, 6:31 am by David Kris
The executive branch believes that the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) does not apply to otherwise-authorized, military cyber activity, and the Supreme Court’s forthcoming decision on the CFAA in Van Buren v. [read post]
24 May 2020, 7:38 am by Cyberleagle
Two Commons Committees –the Home Affairs Committee and the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee – have recently held evidence sessions with government Ministers discussing, among other things, the government’s proposed Online Harms legislation. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
This specific issue has been tackled by the Court of Justice in GC et al v CNIL (C-136/17) finding that Article 9’s permitting of exceptions “necessary for reasons of substantial public interest, on the basis of Union or Member State law” (GDPR, art. 9(2)(g)) could be invoked by Google even in the absence of any Union or Member State statutory provision providing for this and even apparently as regards criminal-related data as specified in article 10 not 9. [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Madison, and the Missouri Crisis are told alongside less familiar ones like Martin v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 4:33 am by Sophie Corke
PatentsGuestKat Léon Dijkman provided an index of some of the most interesting issues in Arnold LJ's wide-ranging FibroGen v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 2:11 am by Shannon O'Hare
France has been hit by an unprecedented economic crisis as a result of COVID-19, with its GDP contracting by 6 per cent in the first quarter of 2020. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 11:23 pm by Matthias Weller
A similar approach (with different outcome) has been taken in Ribeiro v Wright, 2020 ONSC 1829, Court of Ontario, Canada. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 2:38 pm by Giles Peaker
The Secretary of State for the Home Department v R (on the application of) Joint Council for The Welfare of Immigrants (2020) EWCA Civ 542 The Court of Appeal have their way with the judicial review of the ‘Right to Rent’ scheme. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 12:22 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
 Never Too Late 260 [Week ending April 12]: WIPO: China becomes top filer of international patents in 2019 | General Court allows registration of CORNEREYE ... and an argument based on Brexit (briefly) appears | PDOs/PGIs from France and Italy are amending their product specifications to cope with the lockdown | [Guest Post] Red Stripes for Ex-President | “A girl has no name”: Does the decision in MCSN v COSON and 2 Others have any impact on copyright collective… [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 9:02 pm by Fernanda G. Nicola
One month later, the Italian government formed a new task force of 300 experts to help Lombardy cope with the health crisis. [read post]