Search for: "CROSS v. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,382
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2020, 2:54 pm
Thimon timely appealed. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 10:45 am
Before you get too excited about the California Supreme Court agreeing to consider an inverse condemnation case (the Court of Appeal's decision in Weiss v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:12 am
Zalkind v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 8:30 am
Seyfarth Synopsis: The California Supreme Court, in Dynamex Operations v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:00 am
The Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeal's judgment and remanded the case to the trial court for further proceedings on additional issues raised by the State and on the permittees' cross-appeal that the inspection requirements are reimbursable state mandates. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:32 am
BorgWarner Morse TEC, August 5, 2015, Court of Appeal for the State of California – Second District More Blog Entries:Australian Court Awards Highest Verdict for Asbestos Exposure Case in Nation’s History The post Soto v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 1:20 pm
Court of Appeal Reverses a Judgment Sustaining a Demurrer by Blue CrossCoast Plaza Doctors Hospital v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 2:43 pm
On November 1, 2018, the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District affirmed a trial court’s ruling in AMN Healthcare, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 1:26 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 6:15 am
” California’s petition is here. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 5:00 am
The gist is that those older cases pre-dated a significant Supreme Court of California decision in a case called Edwards v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 12:05 pm
The California Court of Appeals recently released a decision reversing a lower court’s ruling in favor of the defendant in a premises liability lawsuit filed after the plaintiff was hit by a car while crossing the street from an overflow parking lot to the defendant’s establishment. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 12:44 pm
The decision comes in a case called Cross v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 2:06 am
Servs. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 7:38 am
July 31, 2013), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that plaintiffs’ “say-on-pay” shareholder derivative suits alleging breach of fiduciary duty were improperly removed to federal court, vacated the district court’s decisions and dismissed the parties’ cross-appeals for lack of jurisdiction. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:05 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 4:36 pm
In a much anticipated decision, the California Supreme Court held, in Prospect Medical Group, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 10:59 pm
In Kurwa v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 11:37 am
The California Court of Appeal, Sixth District, answered this question in Sheppard v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 9:31 am
The en banc court dismissed the tribe’s cross-appeal as moot. [read post]
