Search for: "CROSS v. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA" Results 41 - 60 of 1,389
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2018, 10:45 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Before you get too excited about the California Supreme Court agreeing to consider an inverse condemnation case (the Court of Appeal's decision in Weiss v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
  The Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeal's judgment and remanded the case to the trial court for further proceedings on additional issues raised by the State and on the permittees' cross-appeal that the inspection requirements are reimbursable state mandates. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:32 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
BorgWarner Morse TEC, August 5, 2015, Court of Appeal for the State of California – Second District More Blog Entries:Australian Court Awards Highest Verdict for Asbestos Exposure Case in Nation’s History The post Soto v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 1:20 pm by Pamela Fasick
Court of Appeal Reverses a Judgment Sustaining a Demurrer by Blue CrossCoast Plaza Doctors Hospital v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 1:26 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 5:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
The gist is that those older cases pre-dated a significant Supreme Court of California decision in a case called Edwards v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 12:05 pm by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
The California Court of Appeals recently released a decision reversing a lower court’s ruling in favor of the defendant in a premises liability lawsuit filed after the plaintiff was hit by a car while crossing the street from an overflow parking lot to the defendant’s establishment. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 7:38 am by Sheppard Mullin
July 31, 2013), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that plaintiffs’ “say-on-pay” shareholder derivative suits alleging breach of fiduciary duty were improperly removed to federal court, vacated the district court’s decisions and dismissed the parties’ cross-appeals for lack of jurisdiction. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:05 pm by WIMS
Appealed  from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 4:36 pm
In a much anticipated decision, the California Supreme Court held, in Prospect Medical Group, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 11:37 am by Adrianos Facchetti
The California Court of Appeal, Sixth District, answered this question in Sheppard v. [read post]