Search for: "CROSS v. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,762
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2023, 7:59 am
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), requesting the Court of Appeals conduct an independent review of the record. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 11:50 pm
(California Court of Appeal, June 30, 2023, Wong v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 1:22 pm
The FTC has decided to appeal the Court order. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 2:29 pm
Shortens the time for judicial challenges to 270 days and is intended to resolve CEQA lawsuits (including review by the Courts of Appeal and California Supreme Court) in less than 1 year, instead of the current trend of 4-10 years. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:39 am
California v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 9:14 am
From L.W. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 5:47 am
Tennessee appealed and moved for an emergency stay of the district court's order. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Fuller (Associate Professor, University of Southampton)“The Rise of Alt-Tech and the Role of Gab in the January 6th Insurrection” Expert Statement Rachel Kleinfeld (Senior Fellow, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace)“The Rise in Political Violence in the United States and Damage to Our Democracy”Expert Statement Samantha Kutner (Proud Boys Research Lead, Khalifa Ihler Institute) and Bjørn Ihler (Co-Founder, Khalifa Ihler Institute)“Function Over… [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 11:00 am
The court gave a detailed exegesis of that case, Moore v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 12:20 pm
The FTC v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 8:29 pm
In one particularly fulsome analysis of copyright and rhythm, a Louisiana district court in Batiste v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 3:51 pm
ShareIn Smith v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:10 pm
In a published opinion filed June 7, 2023, the Fifth District Court of Appeal held the trial court erred in applying California’s interrelated factors test to deny a preliminary injunction in a CEQA case. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 6:56 am
The court says this “ignores the distinction drawn by the Internet Brands court between monitoring and policing website content and the duty imposed by California to warn website users of a known harm or danger. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 7:18 pm
[California is appealing the injunction against its “Not Unsafe” Handgun Act.] [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
In Abrams (1922), an intermediate appellate court overturned the order of California’s blue-sky administrator suspending a dealer’s license on the ground that a security he offered was fraudulent. [read post]
31 May 2023, 9:55 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Fried v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:57 pm
California (2014). [read post]
23 May 2023, 8:30 am
Supreme Court’s 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 1:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed a California federal district court’s order denying Amazon.com’s motion to compel arbitration of a proposed class action lawsuit asserting wiretapping and privacy claims. [read post]
