Search for: "CROSS v. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,759
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2014, 9:35 pm
But they still haven't put the U.S. part of the dispute behind them.Yesterday the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard Samsung's appeal of the district court ruling in the first Apple v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 10:38 pm
On October 3, 2013, the California Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Kurwa v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 3:22 pm
But the California Court of Appeal steps up to the plate, and this afternoon published an opinion with a very helpful -- and easily remembered -- pointer for civil litigants.When you're drafting a complaint (or, as here, a cross-complaint), do not ask for damages "according to proof". [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 7:00 am
The California Third District Court of Appeal reversed a 2006 second-degree murder conviction. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Robert Half International Inc., ___ Cal.4th ___ (Aug. 11, 2016), the Supreme Court confirmed that the law is what we thought it was all along: We therefore agree with the Court of Appeal below that “[t]he percentage of fund method survives in California class action cases, and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in using it, in part, to approve the fee request in this class action. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 7:33 am
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit got it wrong—again—ruling last week in U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 3:32 pm
The Court of Appeal ultimately affirmed that order. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 3:32 pm
The Court of Appeal ultimately affirmed that order. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 1:13 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 7:32 am
The Court also cited Watts v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:15 am
District Court for the Southern District of California in the case of Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 1:11 pm
The Court of Appeal agreed. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 5:22 am
California law deems an action “commenced” as of the date the complaint, or cross-complaint, is filed with the court, id. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 1:35 am
The California Blog of Appeal recently posted about U.S. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 9:25 pm
In that regard (the law, not the beignets), the Court of Appeal, in Martinez, et al. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 6:00 am
The California Blog of Appeal has a detailed post on Cruz v. [read post]
13 May 2021, 1:15 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential decision in Free Stream Media Corp. v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 8:30 am
Supreme Court’s 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 5:43 pm
The Court of Appeal rejected that argument, finding that there was sufficient evidence to support the award of punitive damages.On the plaintiff's cross-appeal, however, the Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's determination that the the 10-to-1 ratio of punitive damages to compensatory damages awarded by the jury was excessive, and that the proper ratio is 1-to-1. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 3:13 pm
The January 12, 2022, Court of Appeals opinion in Hayduk v. [read post]