Search for: "CROSS v. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,761
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2023, 1:02 pm
” Most recently, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in City of New York v. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 7:19 am
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that he could not find any meritorious issues to argue and asking the court to conduct its own review. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:54 pm
The court of appeals summed up the case: At the heart of the dispute is whether City of Oakland v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 9:54 am
Seirus cross-appealed from the U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 7:04 am
The appeal in Campbell v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:59 am
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), requesting the Court of Appeals conduct an independent review of the record. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 7:48 am
More specifically, the panel—applying reasoning similar to the California Supreme Court’s in Ixchel Pharma, LLC v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 2:32 am
Addressing apportionment issues left unresolved by the California Supreme Court’s decision in Montrose Chemical Corporation v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:00 am
Blue Cross of California, 2015 WL 3796272 (S.D. [read post]
9 May 2012, 10:02 am
The lower courts cite two California Supreme Court opinions, Clemmer v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 5:34 am
That's what Bexis a few years ago called "cross-jurisdictional" class-action tolling when he was participating in the appeal that became Portwood v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 7:57 am
Instead, the court applied State v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 3:20 pm
” Although initially upheld on appeal, Ameron sought review before the California Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 6:00 am
The Court of Appeal affirmed. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 6:00 am
The Court of Appeal affirmed. [read post]
EFF Asks Ninth Circuit Appeals Court To Strengthen Privacy Protections Of Smart Phones At The Border
19 Jan 2018, 3:20 pm
The case, U.S. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 12:29 pm
(People v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:04 pm
Creative Tech., Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 12:58 pm
That's a waiver, the Court of Appeal says. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 8:25 pm
The California 2nd Court of Appeals issued an interesting opinion addressing the question of just how much of a plaintiff's personal life is fair game on cross-examination in Winfred D. v. [read post]
