Search for: "CROSS v. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA" Results 101 - 120 of 1,392
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2020, 5:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
California Issues the First Published State Appellate Decision Affirming Dismissal of Securities Act Claims on the Pleadings While the dismissal rate of Securities Act cases filed in state court has been historically dismal, especially in comparison to those filed in federal court, the California Court of Appeal, First District’s recent decision in City of Warren Police and Fire Retirement System v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:41 pm by Amy Howe
Rassbach pointed to some of the roles described in the court’s 2012 ruling in Hosanna-Tabor Lutheran Church v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:58 am by Jonathan Glasson QC
The Court of Appeal dismissed the cross-appeal and allowed the appeal on both points. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 5:00 am by Erik Manukyan
This position, first articulated by the court last year in Patel v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 12:40 pm by Scott Birkey and R. Clark Morrison
Given the scope and significance of this decision, it’s likely the decision will be appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
The Third District Court of Appeal applied the California Supreme Court precedent in Friends of the Eel River v. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 3:30 pm by fvanloon
The filings come in the appeals court’s proceedings concerning our lawsuit seeking records concerning “talking points or updates on the Benghazi attack” (Judicial Watch v. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 7:31 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit concluded that this provision did not unambiguously waive sovereign immunity. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:41 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit affirmed. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 2:05 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
They appealed as to the statements about addiction, treatment, and the Passages facilities, and plaintiffs cross-appealed.The appeals court ruled that the trial court correctly held that the book statements were protected speech. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 11:39 am by Eugene Volokh
[The California Court of Appeal reversed, in an interesting case about allegations of physical abuse—and claims that the allegations were themselves a form of "abuse. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 5:05 am by SHG
A few months earlier, a Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals panel in an opinion by Judge Alice Batchelder held that a female accuser did not have a cause of action against the college for allowing the accused to remain on campus. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:52 pm by Linda Friedman Ramirez
By Linda Friedman Ramirez[1]     On February 28, 2020, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decided Innovation Lab v Wolf and affirmed a preliminary injunction against the Department of Homeland Security in its controversial Migrant Protection Protocols.[2]  The injunction had been issued by the District Court for the Northern District of California on April 8, 2019. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:52 pm by Linda Friedman Ramirez
By Linda Friedman Ramirez[1]     On February 28, 2020, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decided Innovation Lab v Wolf and affirmed a preliminary injunction against the Department of Homeland Security in its controversial Migrant Protection Protocols.[2]  The injunction had been issued by the District Court for the Northern District of California on April 8, 2019. [read post]