Search for: "CROSS v. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,762
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2022, 3:13 pm
(California), TikTok PTE Limited (Singapore), Bytedance Ltd. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 6:31 am
Maintaining the trial court’s award of $1,250 per violation – half of the maximum of $2,500 allowed under California law – the appeals court ordered Ethicon to pay over $300 million to the state. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 3:10 am
That one was dismissed in the Northern District of California never to be seen again. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 9:12 pm
In National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:18 am
However, upon appeal, the Court of Appeal held that the public interest defence should be assessed at trial. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:12 am
The appeal related to an anti-SLAPP motion that had been granted to the respondent pursuant to s.137 of the Courts and Justice Act RSO 1990. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 10:28 am
On October 17, 2022, in an issue of first impression at the appellate level, California’s Court of Appeals (First District) published an opinion clarifying that a defendant in a petition for restraining order under California’s Workplace Violence Safety Act (WVSA) is entitled to cross-examine witnesses at the evidentiary hearing for the restraining order. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 12:06 pm
Due to the unforeseen unavailability of a panel member, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit had to postpone the Epic Games v. [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 10:00 am
Ideally, Epic would like the appeals court to then conclude that Apple is engaging in per se tying, meaning that its conduct is illegal and no rule-of-reason balancing is needed. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 11:34 am
It's no longer a secret to which three judges the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has assigned the Epic Games v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 6:31 am
McKenna Sauer Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 8:14 am
Supreme Court on its opening day of the term includes the denial of review in two cases of interest:Church of Scientology v. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 11:17 pm
So this is "cross-wallet" and "cross-purchase" in the sense of "buy here, play there. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 2:46 pm
So, if true, that leaves only the California Supreme Court as the entity that could authorize the transfer. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am
Florida and the plaintiffs will cross-appeal the 11th Circuit ruling to the Supreme Court in the very near future. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 7:56 am
The defendant also had two medical marijuana cards from California in his wallet. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 12:15 am
Fuzu Li v. [read post]
18 Sep 2022, 9:50 am
That's the day on which the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will hear the parties' cross-appeal in San Francisco. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 11:40 pm
Apple case the cross-appeal of which will be heard in a little over a month, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California got the law (Kodak), the economics, and the technology wrong with respect to the foremarket part of Epic's proposed single-brand market definition (she also produced almost 300 typos and similar errors). [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:51 pm
In ZF Micro Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
