Search for: "CROSS v. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2008, 8:25 pm
The California 2nd Court of Appeals issued an interesting opinion addressing the question of just how much of a plaintiff's personal life is fair game on cross-examination in Winfred D. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:31 pm
” People v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 1:36 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 9:27 am
The Court took a number of other significant actions in the orders it issued: ** It refused, over the dissents of three Justices, to review a federal appeals court decision in Rapelje v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 2:00 pm
The Los Angeles Times has this story about a pending California Supreme Court case, Martinez v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 8:41 am
Just over nine years ago, however, the court heard oral argument in Salazar v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 1:03 pm
The city filed a cross complaint to enjoin operations after 11:00 p.m. or dancing. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:12 pm
Recently, in Driscoll v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 9:05 am
” In the case known as Robert Magadia v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 9:32 pm
30 days after Samsung obtained an antisuit injunction against Huawei's enforcement of two standard-essential patent (SEP) injunctions granted by a Chinese court, Huawei filed an appeal and notified the United States District Court for the Northern District of California accordingly:The above screenshot is from an automated notification email to those following the case, which is one of half a dozen cases on my N.D. [read post]
10 May 2007, 3:00 pm
Plaintiffs appealed and Chrysler cross-appealed. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 11:38 am
Barring an appeal to the California Supreme Court, the Ninth Circuit’s decision brings this dolphin tale to a close. [read post]
11 May 2009, 10:45 am
On appeal, Hatfield argued, in part, that the "limitations period was tolled by the filing of a previous class action in New Jersey state court, making this action timely. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 1:16 pm
A recent case out of Washington State decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit -- Ocampo v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
’’ George Frank crossed out language in the addendum providing that he agreed to personally guarantee ‘‘any obligations that may become due. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 5:20 am
In an unpublished opinion, the California Court of Appeal affirmed. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 1:27 pm
It dismissed the City's cross-complaint, saying that the present suit was just about the City's water usage, not everyone else's.Thankfully, the Court of Appeal reverses.I get that the plaintiff might be happy with just an easier suit that's only against one appropriator. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:52 am
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Wednesday in his case, Smith v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 6:08 am
"The Hartford, the workers' compensation carrier for defense contractor JT3 on Edwards Airforce Base, lost an appeal before the 2nd District Court of Appeals, which concluded that the undisputed facts in Schultz v. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 8:14 pm
That’s why we’ll be closely following the developments in the case of County of Santa Cruz et al v. [read post]
