Search for: "CROSS v. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA" Results 141 - 160 of 1,388
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2007, 2:00 pm
Exchange series of cases, according to the Second District Court of Appeal in an opinion published yesterday in Harris v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:10 pm
California (1967) 386 U.S. 18, 24; see, e.g., People v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:16 am by Ted Frank
The nifty aspect of that is that, because the PPACA challengers lost on the issue of severability, they can appeal directly to the Supreme Court, forcing a cross-appeal to the Supreme Court, and ensuring that the Obama administration can't delay Supreme Court consideration past the 2012 election. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 7:38 am
Finally, the Court of Appeal recognized that Rule 3.1306 of the California Rules of Court permits the trial court, in its discretion, to receive oral testimony and cross-examination. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 10:31 am
The Superior Court sided with the city, and when Pack appealed, the California Court of Appeal ruled that the local ordinance was preempted by federal law, namely the Controlled Substances Act. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am by stevemehta
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 4:19 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
District Court for the Central District of California finding that the asserted claims of U.S. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 1:01 pm
 A statute that gives a lesser punishment to a greater offense simply makes no sense.The Court of Appeal agrees. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 6:56 am by Moll Law Group, Ltd
City of Atwater:  The Facts Gonzales was killed while crossing the street in an intersection in Atwater, California. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Last week, the Court of Appeal (Fourth Appellate District, Division Three) picked up  its blue pencil and crossed this provision out of the FAL. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 2:54 pm by Mike
He received a reversal on one of the counts, but the California Court of Appeal otherwise affirmed the judgment. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 5:02 am by Scott Bomboy
A split federal appeals court ordered the cross’s removal from the current property. [read post]