Search for: "CROSS v. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA" Results 161 - 180 of 1,762
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2013, 9:41 am by Florian Mueller
In six weeks from today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will hear Oracle's Android/Java copyright appeal against a ruling by Judge Alsup in the Northern District of California, who sided with Google on a copyrightability question that was outcome-determinative for the most important part of the case: he deemed the "hijacked" declaring code of the Java APIs not to be copyrightable.This morning by Eastern Time the world's leading… [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 12:26 am by Florian Mueller
Apple--will be heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on Friday, October 21, 2022. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 8:14 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Appellants and the Department cross moved for summary judgment, and the District Court granted the Department’s motions on all counts. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 1:06 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Depublication orders usually aren’t exactly the most earthshaking thing on the California Supreme Court’s weekly conference summaries. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 6:52 pm by Patricia Salkin
The United States District Court for the Central District of California, denied motion for intervention as of right and for permissive intervention, and Reynier appealed. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm by Jonathan Holbrook
California, 547 U.S. 843 (2006), a case in which the Supreme Court upheld a warrantless search of a California parolee, limiting the reach of that case to situations in which the supervisee chooses supervision in the community (and its attendant conditions) over imprisonment. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 12:06 pm by Florian Mueller
Due to the unforeseen unavailability of a panel member, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit had to postpone the Epic Games v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 6:42 am by Lazar Radic
District Court for the Northern District of California in Epic Games v Apple, affirming in part and reversing in part the district court’s judgment. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:10 pm
California (1967) 386 U.S. 18, 24; see, e.g., People v. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 4:55 pm by Unknown
Tammy appeals the judgment in favor of Louise; she does not appeal the trial court's ruling with regard to her cross-complaint. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 4:55 pm by Unknown
Tammy appeals the judgment in favor of Louise; she does not appeal the trial court's ruling with regard to her cross-complaint. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 12:14 pm
DJ piece by H&L's David Axelrad, which asserts that "Briefs within the current California limits – 14,000 words for principal briefs and 28,000 words for combined briefs in a cross-appeal – are often too long and would be far more effective if shortened. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 2:00 pm
Exchange series of cases, according to the Second District Court of Appeal in an opinion published yesterday in Harris v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 10:31 am
The Superior Court sided with the city, and when Pack appealed, the California Court of Appeal ruled that the local ordinance was preempted by federal law, namely the Controlled Substances Act. [read post]
24 May 2010, 1:05 pm by Kent Scheidegger
"At the time of Petitioner's appeal, it was neither contrary to, nor an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law [for] the California appellate courts to rule that the forfeiture did not require proof of an intent to make the witness unavailable. [read post]
27 May 2021, 12:44 pm
Every one of the 3rd District's 250 long-delayed criminal appeals has crossed that line. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 7:38 am
Finally, the Court of Appeal recognized that Rule 3.1306 of the California Rules of Court permits the trial court, in its discretion, to receive oral testimony and cross-examination. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:16 am by Ted Frank
The nifty aspect of that is that, because the PPACA challengers lost on the issue of severability, they can appeal directly to the Supreme Court, forcing a cross-appeal to the Supreme Court, and ensuring that the Obama administration can't delay Supreme Court consideration past the 2012 election. [read post]