Search for: "CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC." Results 21 - 40 of 184
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2011, 9:21 am
Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a judgment for CSX Transportation Inc. last week in a case brought by a group of citizens seeking medical monitoring for the small Ohio town of Painesville, after a train derailment in 2007. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:53 pm
Despite a vigorous dissent by the Chief Justice, the majority in CSX Transportation, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 8:54 am
This morning, the Supreme Court issued a per curiam decision in CSX Transportation, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 6:49 am by Daily Record Staff
Torts — Federal Employers’ Liability Act — Subsequent claim This appeal concerns a claim for damages arising from an employer’s negligence under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (“FELA”), 45 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 6:18 pm by Anna Christensen
United States, and we have updated the case pages for CSX Transportation Inc., Connick v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 8:55 am
Farr has accused CSX Transportation, Inc. of negligence under the Federal Employers Liability Act. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 8:41 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Tuesday ruled [opinion, PDF] 7-2 in CSX Transportation, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 7:47 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
The petition of the day is: CSX Transportation, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 10:40 am by Danny Jacobs
Norfolk Southern Corp. and CSX Transportation Inc. each filed a lawsuit against the Maryland Department of the Environment last summer as the department was preparing to disclose the information at the request of McClatchy Newspapers and the Associated Press. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 11:38 am
CIVIL PROCEDURE, INJURY AND TORT LAW, PER CURIAM, TRANSPORTATION CSX Transp., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 7:42 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
CSX Transportation, Inc. 13-553 Issue: Whether a state “discriminates against a rail carrier” in violation of 49 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:22 pm by Aurora Barnes
CSX Transportation, Inc. 16-1251 Issues: (1) Whether the dormant commerce clause requires a State that imposes a fairly apportioned use tax to also credit sales taxes paid to other States; and (2) whether the dormant commerce clause requires a State that does not impose county or municipal use taxes to provide a credit for sales taxes paid to other States’ counties or municipalities. [read post]