Search for: "CWA" Results 281 - 300 of 1,057
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2011, 7:30 pm by John H Curley
Arbitrator Jack Tillem has issued an award in a dispute concerning the layoff provisions of the Verizon/CWA labor agreement. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 10:52 am
  For the text of the decision follow this link to The Guard Publishing Company d/b/a The Register-Guard and Eugene Newspaper Guild, CWA Local 37194. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 10:35 am by Prof. Coplan, Karl S.
by Karl Coplan The New York Times’ excellent series on the environmental issues associated with hydrofracking exposes a long-exploited loophole in the regulation of industrial wastes. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 7:29 pm
Under the CWA alone, gross negligence penaltes based upon a discharge rate of 19,000 barrels per day would total to $57 Million Per Day. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 10:00 pm
Provisions contained within the CAA and CWA are considered to be technology based and have arguably helped drive innovation. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 5:05 pm by Joe Koncelik
  The case relates to the State of New York’s permitting authority under the Clean Water Act (CWA). [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 8:03 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The WOTUS rule is important because it determines the scope of the federal government's regulatory jurisdiction over waters and wetlands under the CWA. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 3:00 am
The Sackett case involved an EPA compliance order under the CWA involving consequences that were so serious and final as to warrant pre-enforcement judicial review. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 8:03 am by Taryn Rucinski
§ 1369, and may instead challenge the validity of the rule in a citizen suit to enforce the CWA? [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 5:31 pm
402(b) of the CWA, it follows that a transfer of . . . permitting authority does not trigger ? [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 1:54 pm by Vicki Treanor
Army Corps of Engineers (the “Corps”) (together, the “Agencies”)  announced a final rule (the “Repeal Rule”) rescinding the 2015 Clean Water Rule (the “2015 Rule”) that defined “waters of the United States” (“WOTUS”) under the Clean Water Act (“CWA”). [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 10:00 pm
This review could result in reversing the prior determination that the Clean Water Act’s (CWA’s) technology-based effluent limits do not apply. [read post]
30 May 2023, 7:01 am by Howard Wasserman
Those 15 pages ostensibly cover the structure and history of the Clean Water Act (CWA), but that background information is neatly interwoven with a narrative of the “crushing consequences even for inadvertent violations” that property owners are subjected to under the Act. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 10:00 pm
This review could result in reversing the prior determination that the Clean Water Act’s (CWA’s) technology-based effluent limits do not apply. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 10:00 pm
This review could result in reversing the prior determination that the Clean Water Act’s (CWA’s) technology-based effluent limits do not apply. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 10:00 pm
This review could result in reversing the prior determination that the Clean Water Act’s (CWA’s) technology-based effluent limits do not apply. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 10:00 pm
This review could result in reversing the prior determination that the Clean Water Act’s (CWA’s) technology-based effluent limits do not apply. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 10:00 pm
This review could result in reversing the prior determination that the Clean Water Act’s (CWA’s) technology-based effluent limits do not apply. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:01 pm by Sahana Rao
Army Corps of Engineers (together, the “Agencies”) published a final rule in the Federal Register redefining the term “waters of the United States” (“WOTUS”) under the Clean Water Act (“CWA”). [read post]