Search for: "CWA" Results 41 - 60 of 865
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2018, 7:09 am by Lindsay Offutt
Environmental Protection Agency [docket] was whether the CWA requires dischargers to have a permit for every water transfer, pursuant to the CWA's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System provision. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 9:00 am
  The court held that Section 308 of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”) does not supersede Exemption 4 of FOIA. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 9:00 am
Dayton Hudson Corp., 24 F.3d 962 (7th Cir. 1994) wherein the Circuit court had held that discharges into groundwater were not regulated under the CWA. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:00 am by Claudia V. Colón García-Moliner
The Clean Water Act (“CWA”) generally forbids discharging contaminated effluent into waters of the United States unless the discharger holds a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) permit. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 9:00 am
Instead, the court adopted the bright line rule that for a point source discharge to be actionable under the CWA, it must “dump directly into” navigable waters. [read post]
10 Dec 2012, 2:25 pm by The Federalist Society
The question is whether, notwithstanding the existence of the NPDES, a person may challenge the validity of a CWA rule by a different means; namely, a citizen-suit to enforce the CWA. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 11:04 am
Via the AFL-CIO Weblog: After a week of intense bargaining, members of the Flight Attendants-CWA (AFA-CWA) and Northwest Airlines... [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 2:00 am by Anthony B. Cavender
 Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit issued a Clean Water Act (CWA)  ruling affirming the decision of the lower court that STABL, Inc. the former owner and operator of a rendering plant in Lexington, Nebraska, violated the CWA and the Nebraska Environmental Protection Act. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 2:00 am
District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia held that the waste water discharges of a mining operation in the coal mining areas were subject to a Clean Water Act (CWA) and Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA) citizen suit. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 9:00 am
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that ICG Hazard, LLC's Clean Water Act (CWA) general permit defense, located in the CWA at 33 U.S.C. 1342(k), shielded the mining company from a CWA enforcement lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:53 am by Katherine McCoy
Circuit Court of Appeals held that the EPA’s veto authority under section 404(c) of the Clean Water Act (CWA), 33 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 8:47 am
Based on those allegations, a federal jury convicted Tuma on 3 counts of violating the CWA, 1 count of conspiracy to violate the CWA, and 1 count of obstructing justice with respect to the EPA’s inspection of the Arkla facility. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 3:00 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a decision rejecting the argument that a Clean Water Act (CWA) "permit shield" required the dismissal of a CWA citizen suit. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 1:28 pm by Walter James
The proposed revision of the Clean Water Act would delete a single word from the CWA and would greatly expand the authority to regulate water pollution. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 12:21 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
(released August 18, 2017), rejected the Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC ’s (Constitution) petition for review after the New York Department of Environmental Conservation (NYDEC) denied its application for a Clean Water Act (CWA) 401 certification. [read post]