Search for: "Cabral v. Ralphs Grocery" Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2011, 11:01 am
As a result, Ralphs Grocery Co. must now pay the widow of Adelelmo Cabral $475,298 for his wrongful death. [read post]
6 May 2014, 1:47 pm by Glotzer & Sweat
 This was the question presented recently to the California Supreme Court in the matter of Cabral v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 8:28 pm by Chris Bruni
Relying on recent California Supreme Court rulings, particularly Cabral v Ralphs Grocery (see June 30, 2011 post), the Court found that since there was no duty owed by Ford for this secondary exposure, there could be no liability for any resulting injury to its employee's spouse caused by this "take home" exposure. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 10:58 pm by Chris Bruni
In Cabral, a truck driver employed by Ralphs Grocery stopped his tractor-trailer rig alongside Interstate 10 in order to have a snack. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 10:00 am by Bruce Nye
Ralph's Grocery Company, S178799 and what it might augur for one of CBL's all time stupid cases, Bigbee v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 9:41 am by Abby Adams
Ralphs Grocery Co. (2011) 51 Cal.4th 764, 771; Rowland v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:18 pm by Brad Pauley
 The Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division One, held, under the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Cabral v. [read post]