Search for: "Caetano v. Massachusetts" Results 41 - 60 of 70
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2016, 8:06 am
Consider the SCOTUS per curiam earlier this Term in Caetano v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 11:34 am by Andrew Hamm
” John Grimm Maryland Appellate Blog discusses the possible impact of the Court’s recent per curiam decision in the stun-gun case Caetano v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 9:46 am by John C. Manoog III
Related Blog Posts: United States Supreme Court Reverses Conviction in Massachusetts Stun Gun Possession Case – Caetano v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 1:48 pm by John C. Manoog III
Related Blog Posts: United States Supreme Court Reverses Conviction in Massachusetts Stun Gun Possession Case – Caetano v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 4:43 pm by John C. Manoog III
Related Blog Posts United States Supreme Court Reverses Conviction in Massachusetts Stun Gun Possession Case – Caetano v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 9:50 am by Alan Gura
” In Caetano, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court lost the plot. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 4:31 am
The Second Amendment does require application in particular cases (such as the case from last month, Caetano v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am by John Elwood
That includes six-time relists Caetano v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 11:42 am
Caetano, now pending before the Massachusetts high court; that cases involves the question whether stun guns and Tasers are “arms” for Second Amendment purposes; we argue that they are.) [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 7:47 am by Daniel Cappetta
Specifically, in a recent case decided by the United States Supreme Court – Caetano v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 10:02 am by John Elwood
They probably mean Caetano v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 8:47 am by David Kopel
In the 2016 Caetano case, the Court per curiam overturned a Massachusetts decision that had upheld a stun gun ban since stun guns did not exist in 1791. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 11:09 am
Justice Alito likely shares Thomas's views, as reflected in his concurring-in-the-judgment opinion in Caetano v. [read post]