Search for: "Cain v. State" Results 241 - 260 of 371
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2012, 8:00 am by Rob Robinson
bit.ly/wVssl2 (Jim Eidelman) Privilege Or Work Product Waivers - bit.ly/xENsqj (Federal Evidence Review) Resolution on 'Pippins' Discovery Nears, Though Debate Continues - bit.ly/zTrmUQ (Evan Koblentz) Review Website Ordered to Close after Defaming and Harassing Lawyers - bit.ly/tV21Ex (Pinsent Masons) Singapore eDiscovery Case Update: Surface Stone Pte Ltd v Tay Seng Leon and Another [2011] SGHC 223 - bit.ly/AcLYYc (Serena Lim) Social Media Gotchas in Court - bit.ly/AlNxmG (Eric… [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:31 am by Conor McEvily
Cain, the Court held that the failure of prosecutors in the New Orleans district attorney’s office to fulfill their constitutional duty (under the 1963 decision in Brady v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:42 pm by Steve Hall
  The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 9:56 am by Kali Borkoski
Cain, announced for the Court by Chief Justice Roberts. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:31 pm by Rick Hasen
Lane, 66 Ohio State Law Journal 177 (2005) The California Recall Punch Card Litigation: Why Bush v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:35 am by Joshua Matz
” Emphasizing the dispute over state-federal relations in Arizona v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 1:15 pm by John Elwood
United States, 11-7029, and Cain v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 10:32 am by Jeff Gamso
  See, especially, Justice Sutherland in Berger v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 10:45 am by John Elwood
Cain, 10-8145, argued on November 8. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:38 pm by Steve Hall
Cain and last session's ruling in Connick v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am by Joshua Matz
United States, in which the state seeks review of a Ninth Circuit decision blocking the enforcement of key provisions of Arizona’s immigration law. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 6:26 am by Kiran Bhat
Tuesday’s arguments in the GPS surveillance case United States v. [read post]