Search for: "Cain v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 363
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2015, 6:53 am by Dominic Yobbi
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] 5-4 Thursday in Brumfield v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 7:51 am by Amy Howe
Cain, a capital case from Louisiana. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:49 pm by Jeff Gamso
 And they're up to 4 law clerks/staff attorneys each.From the oral argument before the court Monday morning in Brumfield v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:27 am by Dominic Yobbi
Cain [SCOTUSblog docket] the court will decide whether [Oyez Project summary] a state court's decision to deny an Atkins claim, when the defendant did not have the opportunity or funds to... [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 3:06 am by Amy Howe
Cain, a capital case from Louisiana. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 9:35 am by Lyle Denniston
Cain, the Justices and their clerks may need to start right away digging very deeply into at least twenty volumes of a record compiled in a state court. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 7:59 pm by Steven D. Schwinn
Cain, the case testing how state courts must consider evidence of mental retardation in death penalty sentencing proceedings. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 6:22 am by Timothy P. Flynn
The issue to be considered by the SCOTUS tomorrow morning in Brumfield v Cain is whether the 8th Amendment requires yet another separate hearing to solely consider evidence of the asserted mental disability.If such an evidentiary hearing is required, it would be a trial, within a trial, within a trial. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 7:13 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Cain: (1) Whether a state court that considers the evidence presented at a petitioner’s penalty phase proceeding as determinative of the petitioner’s claim of mental retardation under... [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:35 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Louisiana, No. 14-6381, was moot because a settlement had been reached back in the state court.Apparently no one has told the Supreme Court that yet, and they have set the argument for March 30.Brumfield v. [read post]