Search for: "Cain v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 379
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2012, 8:23 pm
President Barack Obama delivered his State of the Union address this evening, and it was even less exciting than last year (which was less exciting than the year before, when the famous Obama v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:53 am
Sims, 12-1217, and the trio of state-on-top habeas cases, Ryan v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 4:13 pm
Cain, No. 13-1433. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 6:27 am
” The Arizona Supreme Court, in Cain v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 1:04 pm
Google, Doe v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 4:40 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 11:30 am
Cain v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:58 am
Jones (Sentencing)Cain v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 8:01 am
Cain (2012) and Connick v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 6:16 am
Cain, Visiting Research Fellow at the Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance; Robert J. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Mary Ziegler on the Texas, the Supreme Court and Roe v. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm
See Hay v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
Today, the Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Cain 14-567Issue: (1) Whether, when evaluating if a state court’s decision is based upon an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence before the state court under 28 § U.S.C. 2254(d)(2), the clear and convincing standard of Section 2254(e)(1) governs the determination of unreasonableness; (2) whether the state court decision, finding no deficient performance, constituted an unreasonable application of Strickland v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
United States, a case that presents questions about the relationship between religious speech and political speech for purposes of tax exemptions. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm
Cain. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 1:15 pm
Harris (10-224) — state power to regulate the operation of slaughterhouses Kurns v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 6:45 am
President of the United States. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 6:55 am
Basically, they are: 1) the statutory law exception of Scolaro v Ohio University; 2) a lease or other contract may create a duty/obligation to remove ice and snow; 3) if you undertake to remove snow/ice, you can be held liable if you do so negligently, or in a way that makes the area more hazardous than it had been without your efforts at snow removal; and 4) you may be held liable for unnatural accumulations of ice which result, for example from the negligent design of a parking lot (See… [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm
*Tuesday, November 8:United States v. [read post]
