Search for: "Cain v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 390
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2015, 7:27 am
Cain [SCOTUSblog docket] the court will decide whether [Oyez Project summary] a state court's decision to deny an Atkins claim, when the defendant did not have the opportunity or funds to... [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 3:06 am
Cain, a capital case from Louisiana. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 9:35 am
Cain, the Justices and their clerks may need to start right away digging very deeply into at least twenty volumes of a record compiled in a state court. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 8:22 pm
29 Mar 2015, 7:59 pm
Cain, the case testing how state courts must consider evidence of mental retardation in death penalty sentencing proceedings. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 6:22 am
The issue to be considered by the SCOTUS tomorrow morning in Brumfield v Cain is whether the 8th Amendment requires yet another separate hearing to solely consider evidence of the asserted mental disability.If such an evidentiary hearing is required, it would be a trial, within a trial, within a trial. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 7:13 pm
Cain: (1) Whether a state court that considers the evidence presented at a petitioner’s penalty phase proceeding as determinative of the petitioner’s claim of mental retardation under... [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 10:38 am
In Brumfield v. [read post]
Supreme Court Declines to Enshrine the Independence of the Bar as a Principle of Fundamental Justice
13 Feb 2015, 8:50 am
Malmo-Levine; R. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
” In Brinkman v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:35 pm
Louisiana, No. 14-6381, was moot because a settlement had been reached back in the state court.Apparently no one has told the Supreme Court that yet, and they have set the argument for March 30.Brumfield v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Cain 14-567Issue: (1) Whether, when evaluating if a state court’s decision is based upon an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence before the state court under 28 § U.S.C. 2254(d)(2), the clear and convincing standard of Section 2254(e)(1) governs the determination of unreasonableness; (2) whether the state court decision, finding no deficient performance, constituted an unreasonable application of Strickland v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 7:08 am
United States, 14-282, is yet another gift from the St. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm
Cain, 13-1433, a case that we were sure would result in a dissent from denial of cert. or somesuch. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 3:41 am
Texas Division, Son of Confederate Veterans, involving a state’s power to create a specialty license plate program which controls the messages that may be displayed; Brumfield v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 4:13 pm
Cain, No. 13-1433. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 11:21 am
Cain, the issue of Kevan Brumfield’s mental state was decided as an issue at the penalty phase of his murder trial, rather than at a separate inquiry. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
Cain 13-1433Issue: (1) Whether a state court that considers the evidence presented at a petitioner’s penalty phase proceeding as determinative of the petitioner’s claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 7:23 am
Cain 13-1433Issue: (1) Whether a state court that considers the evidence presented at a petitioner’s penalty phase proceeding as determinative of the petitioner’s claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Cain 13-1433Issue: (1) Whether a state court that considers the evidence presented at a petitioner’s penalty phase proceeding as determinative of the petitioner’s claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]
