Search for: "Cain v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 383
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Supreme Court Declines to Enshrine the Independence of the Bar as a Principle of Fundamental Justice
13 Feb 2015, 8:50 am
Malmo-Levine; R. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
” In Brinkman v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:35 pm
Louisiana, No. 14-6381, was moot because a settlement had been reached back in the state court.Apparently no one has told the Supreme Court that yet, and they have set the argument for March 30.Brumfield v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Cain 14-567Issue: (1) Whether, when evaluating if a state court’s decision is based upon an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence before the state court under 28 § U.S.C. 2254(d)(2), the clear and convincing standard of Section 2254(e)(1) governs the determination of unreasonableness; (2) whether the state court decision, finding no deficient performance, constituted an unreasonable application of Strickland v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 7:08 am
United States, 14-282, is yet another gift from the St. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm
Cain, 13-1433, a case that we were sure would result in a dissent from denial of cert. or somesuch. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 3:41 am
Texas Division, Son of Confederate Veterans, involving a state’s power to create a specialty license plate program which controls the messages that may be displayed; Brumfield v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 4:13 pm
Cain, No. 13-1433. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 11:21 am
Cain, the issue of Kevan Brumfield’s mental state was decided as an issue at the penalty phase of his murder trial, rather than at a separate inquiry. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
Cain 13-1433Issue: (1) Whether a state court that considers the evidence presented at a petitioner’s penalty phase proceeding as determinative of the petitioner’s claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 7:23 am
Cain 13-1433Issue: (1) Whether a state court that considers the evidence presented at a petitioner’s penalty phase proceeding as determinative of the petitioner’s claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Cain 13-1433Issue: (1) Whether a state court that considers the evidence presented at a petitioner’s penalty phase proceeding as determinative of the petitioner’s claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
Cain 13-1433Issue: (1) Whether a state court that considers the evidence presented at a petitioner’s penalty phase proceeding as determinative of the petitioner’s claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
Farina, 13-1227, a state-on-top habeas case involving how much leeway a federal court is allowed in determining that a state court made an unreasonable factual determination; and Whitman v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:15 am
Cain 13-1433Issue: (1) Whether a state court that considers the evidence presented at a petitioner’s penalty phase proceeding as determinative of the petitioner’s claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am
Cain, 13-1433, gets its third relist since arrival of the record. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm
Cain 13-1433Issue: (1) Whether a state court that considers the evidence presented at a petitioner’s penalty phase proceeding as determinative of the petitioner’s claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm
Cain 13-1433Issue: (1) Whether a state court that considers the evidence presented at a petitioner's penalty phase proceeding as determinative of the petitioner's claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:11 am
United States, 14-5227, and Freidus v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am
Cain, 13-1433, is a capital case from the world’s prison capitol that asks “[w]hether a state court that considers evidence presented at a petitioner’s penalty phase proceeding as determinative of petitioner’s claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]
