Search for: "Calder v. Jones" Results 61 - 80 of 82
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2014, 4:18 pm by Paul Levy
   It is generally accepted at the appellate level, following the US Supreme Court’s decision in Organization for a Better Austin v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 12:37 pm
The jurisdiction granted by the federal and state legislation only is constitutional under the "effects test" of Calder v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:47 pm by Adrianos Facchetti
The “effects” test comes from the Supreme Court’s decision in Calder v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 12:34 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
  There is even Supreme Court precedent to support this contention: in 1984, the US Supreme Court in Calder v. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 12:13 pm by Andrew Hamm
Facebook Inc. 19-910Issue: Whether, under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, virtual contacts can establish specific personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant under the effects-based test of Calder v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:27 pm by Rory Little
Jones and California Department of Corrections v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
The Cotton v Berry case provoked criticism about judicial competence for handling cases involving family violence, particularly coercive control. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 6:17 pm by Inside Privacy
Al Kassar, 660 F.3d 108, 118 (2d Cir. 2011). [4] United States v. [read post]