Search for: "California Public Utilities Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission" Results 1 - 20 of 91
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2012, 1:55 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an opinion confirming that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") cannot order publicly-owned utilities to pay refunds. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 10:59 am by William Rappolt and Paul Kaufman
In a recent opinion, the Ninth Circuit held that the California Public Utilities Commission’s (CPUC) Renewable Market Adjusting Tariff (Re-MAT) program and alternative Qualifying Facility (QF) standard offer contract (Standard Contract) were preempted by federal law. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 10:59 am by William Rappolt and Paul Kaufman
In a recent opinion, the Ninth Circuit held that the California Public Utilities Commission’s (CPUC) Renewable Market Adjusting Tariff (Re-MAT) program and alternative Qualifying Facility (QF) standard offer contract (Standard Contract) were preempted by federal law. [read post]
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”) issued on April 16, 2020 two orders[1] largely denying requests for rehearing of its prior decisions that, among other things, subjected to minimum offer price thresholds energy resources participating in PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 3:49 pm by Seth Hilton
Peterman et al., ruling that California’s feed-in tariff for small qualifying facilities (QFs), the Renewable Market Adjusting Tariff (ReMAT), violates the federal Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) (Ninth Circuit Case No. 17-17531). [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 3:49 pm by Seth Hilton
Peterman et al., ruling that California’s feed-in tariff for small qualifying facilities (QFs), the Renewable Market Adjusting Tariff (ReMAT), violates the federal Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) (Ninth Circuit Case No. 17-17531). [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:41 pm
  The buyers' complaints were initially raised at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, which denied the challenges on the ground that the Federal Power Act authorized FERC to change the terms of a bilateral contract only if the contract were improperly induced (for example, through fraud or duress) or found to be contrary to public (as opposed to private) interest. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 9:03 pm by Henry Miller
California Attorney General Rob Bonta called the decision “a victory for public safety in California,” and noted that the decision still allows “law-abiding gun owners to exercise their constitutional rights. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 9:07 pm by Tyler Hoguet
Instead, federal regulation of cannabis should recognize and support robust, existing state regulatory systems, Litman concluded. [read post]
Second, we present evidence on public-company disclosures consistent with issuers’ understanding that the SEC has long had authority to take regulatory action in this area. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
SIGNIFICANT LEGAL AND REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS IN 2022 SEC’s proposed climate-related disclosure rules:  On March 21, 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission proposed expansive climate-related disclosure requirements in a proposing release that, if adopted, would require U.S. public companies and foreign private issuers to dramatically expand the breadth, specificity and rigor of climate-related disclosures in their SEC periodic reports and registration… [read post]
  (2) Does the Federal Power Act preempt state court challenges to an environmental impact report prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act in order to comply with the federal water quality certification under the federal Clean Water Act? [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
— Christopher Joyce, National Public Radio, December 7, 2009 The United States has all the tools it needs to replace its old coal energy economy and drastically cut greenhouse emissions. [read post]