Search for: "California Bank v. Diamond" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am by admin
”[8] The formula provided is correct, but the interpretation of a 95% probability that the interval covers the true parameter is unequivocably wrong.[9] The third edition’s chapter by Shari Seidman Diamond on survey research, on the other hand, gave an anodyne example and a definition: “A survey expert could properly compute a confidence interval around the 20% estimate obtained from this sample. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 4:44 am by Emma Snell
 “To the victims of gun violence and their families: California stands with you. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Warby J handed down a judgment in the case of Birmingham City Council v Afsar. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 7:36 am by Arina Shulga
   Some legal practitioners adopted a conservative attitude trying to fit the tokens of their clients within the tests provided by the 1946 SEC v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 2:16 am by CFM Admin
The second ICO was marketed similarly but with respect to the diamond industry. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Ambiguity between how much of the discourse in A2K is targeted at patent v. copyright. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:08 am by Dennis Crouch
Just six weeks after the Planet Blue decision, another Section 101 decision came out from the Central District of California, this one authored by Judge Pfaelzer, in California Institute of Technology v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 7:18 am by Jason Rantanen
” Breyer contrasted those steps with the additional steps claimed in Diamond v. [read post]