Search for: "California Communities Against Toxics v. EPA" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2012, 3:40 pm by WIMS
In considering whether vacatur is warranted, we must balance these errors against the consequences of such a remedy."       [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:56 am by Anthony B. Cavender
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit decided the case of California Communities Against Toxics, et al. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 9:15 am by Anthony B. Cavender
Court of Appeals or the District of Columbia has recently issued two important rulings on the Clean Air Act in particular and administrative law in general: California Communities Against Toxics, et al., v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 11:08 am
Count me as someone who agrees with the Ninth Circuit in this case that the appropriate remedy is to remand the case (as both parties recognize) but not vacate the EPA's rule in the interim.  [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
EPA, that EPA, when deciding whether it was appropriate and necessary to regulate Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) such as, for instance, mercury and other toxic pollutants emitted from electric utility power plants, must consider the costs of compliance at this stage of the rulemaking proceedings. [read post]
21 May 2015, 9:00 am by WIMS
District Court for the Central District of California in Los Angeles against the U.S. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
Click Here Tanco Kansas City to Pay $97,845 Civil Penalty for Violations of Clean Water Act, Failure to Prepare Facility Response Plan. – EPA News Release, August 10, 2010 Tanco Kansas City, LLP, a bulk materials storage facility, has agreed to pay a $97,845 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated federal laws by failing to properly document its storage of sulfuric acid and prepare a Facility Response Plan (FRP) to… [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
EPA cited the companies for violating the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA), which requires companies that manufacture, use or process more than a threshold amount of listed toxic chemicals to file an annual toxic chemical release form with EPA and the state. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
Click Here EPA seeks fine against Fafard for stormwater violations. – Milford Daily News, July 21, 2010 Environmental officials are seeking a $150,000 fine against Fafard Real Estate and Development and two related companies for alleged stormwater violations at about 13 construction sites. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm by Steven M. Taber
The settlement addresses violations of numerous laws, including the Clean Air Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and the Toxic Substances Control Act. [read post]