Search for: "California Communities Against Toxics v. EPA" Results 1 - 20 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2012, 3:40 pm by WIMS
In considering whether vacatur is warranted, we must balance these errors against the consequences of such a remedy. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:56 am by Anthony B. Cavender
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit decided the case of California Communities Against Toxics, et al. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 9:15 am by Anthony B. Cavender
Court of Appeals or the District of Columbia has recently issued two important rulings on the Clean Air Act in particular and administrative law in general: California Communities Against Toxics, et al., v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 11:08 am
Count me as someone who agrees with the Ninth Circuit in this case that the appropriate remedy is to remand the case (as both parties recognize) but not vacate the EPA's rule in the interim. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
EPA, that EPA, when deciding whether it was appropriate and necessary to regulate Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) such as, for instance, mercury and other toxic pollutants emitted from electric utility power plants, must consider the costs of compliance at this stage of the rulemaking proceedings. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm by admin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 9:00 am by WIMS
District Court for the Central District of California in Los Angeles against the U.S. [read post]
15 May 2009, 12:30 pm
    There were two cases filed, one by the Sierra Club, NRDC, Steelworkers, etc. against the governor, State EPA, OEHHA, the Cancer Identification Committee ("CIC"), its members and others and the other by the Chamber of Commerce against the governor and the directors of the State EPA and OEHHA. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
The community advisory group also will act as a communication conduit and forum for stakeholders within the community surrounding the Bannister Federal Complex. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
Most of the communities served by the drinking water treatment plants that will be upgraded under the agreement are in low income communities. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
EPA News Release, August 10, 2010 Tanco Kansas City, LLP, a bulk materials storage facility, has agreed to pay a $97,845 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated federal laws by failing to properly document its storage of sulfuric acid and prepare a Facility Response Plan (FRP) to guard against spills of its materials into a tributary of the Missouri River. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
It lays out the reasons for more than $3 million in fines announced on Monday by OSHA against BP joint-venture refinery in Ohio. [read post]