Search for: "California Company v. Price" Results 61 - 80 of 1,615
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2023, 12:37 pm
Three years ago, when the Court of Appeal struck down Section 1814 of the Insurance Code, which prohibits bail companies from paying inmates from referring potential customers, as an unconstitutional infringement of free speech, I was skeptical, saying (among other things):Letting bail agents make "arrangements" with inmates to refer clients to 'em clearly, in my view, distorts the marketplace, and punishing such conduct will lead to a marketplace more closely (albeit… [read post]
3 Nov 2018, 11:55 am by Nassiri Law
In federal court, plaintiffs are seeking reversal of an employee-contractor test laid forth in the California Supreme Court in the case of Dynamex Operations West Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 12:12 pm
On August 18, the California Supreme Court ruled in the case of Howell v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 10:55 pm by Jarod Bona
He lives in San Diego and is in the process of becoming a member of the California bar. [read post]
5 May 2015, 1:55 pm by Alan Friel
Some e-commerce companies have experimented with personalized pricing, sometimes with negative consumer and press reaction, and there have been suggestions by some commentators that the practice is or should be illegal. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 8:26 am
  Gradient even touted to potential customers how much a negative report on Gradient could cause the share price of a company to drop. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:39 am by John Jascob
The court concluded that although the company’s stock price dropped after the company disclosed a failure to meet revenue projections, the plaintiffs did not establish any actionable misrepresentations. [read post]