Search for: "California Democratic Party v. Jones" Results 21 - 40 of 73
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2007, 4:06 pm
This will be a follow-up to the Court's decision in California Democratic Party v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:28 pm by Derek Muller
Kagan also cited California Democratic Party v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:06 pm by Jacek Stramski
Jones also backtracks from the notion that simply sharing information with a third party is automatically a per se waiver of an individual’s Fourth Amendment rights. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 2:41 am by INFORRM
Journalism and regulation There are no new PCC adjudications to report, but a few resolved cases: Richard Jones v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 22/03/2013; Levy & McRae Solicitors, on behalf of Christopher and Mary Gorman v The Sun, Clause 1, 22/03/2013; Mr Dean Torkington v The Sunday Times, Clause 1, 22/03/2013; Dr Helen Hammond v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 22/03/2013; Basim Shamsuddin v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 19/03/2013; Noveprim Group… [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:16 am by J. Gordon Hylton
This means that both Alaska and California would have the same one vote, and 26 votes would be necessary to elect a president. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 8:52 am by Edward Foley
Likewise, Kennedy in 2000 wrote separately in California Democratic Party v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
On 6 and 7 November 2019 the Supreme Court (Lady Hale and Lords Reed, Kerr, Hodge and Lloyd-Jones) heard the appeal in the case of W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am by Larry Catá Backer
Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1 (1937) (federal regulatory power extended to intra state activities that could cumulatively have a substantial effect on commerce);  Heart of Atlanta Motel v. [read post]