Search for: "California Federal Bank, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States, Defendant-cross Appellant"
Results 1 - 20
of 49
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2018, 1:00 pm
Arab Bank, which held that the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) did not permit federal courts to recognize causes of action against foreign corporations. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 11:29 am
Attorney General United States, No. 19-1404 (3d Cir. 2020) Related posts: Fourth Circuit Rejects Anti-Spam Lawsuit–Omega World Travel v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
State of California (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1108; see People v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 11:49 am
Los Angeles County, California, Petitioner v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 9:15 am
"
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of Amercia et al. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 3:00 am
United States (9th Cir. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 3:00 am
United States (9th Cir. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
US, No. 06-11612 Express consent by counsel suffices to permit a magistrate judge to preside over jury selection in a felony trial, pursuant to the authorization in the Federal Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. section 636(b)(3). [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/SU6 United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:02 am
CORIOLAN, Appellant, v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
See Holy Cross Church of God in Christ v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:26 pm
What if a foreign plaintiff buys stock in a foreign company whose securities are cross-listed on U.S. exchanges? [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 3:57 pm
” The individual Defendants, both residents of California, moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, and all Defendants moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
TAKINGS Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Philadelphia, No. 07-1461 In an action stemming from the arrest of plaintiffs-protestors at a street festival in Philadelphia, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where: 1) defendant-event organizer had a First Amendment right to exclude plaintiffs-Repent America from its permitted event, despite the event's being held on public streets and sidewalks; 2) city properly imposed narrowly-tailored restrictions upon plaintiff's protest in a… [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Banks, 126 S.Ct. 2572 (2006), held that Mills was not retroactively applicable on collateral review. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Amato , No. 06-5600, 06-5741, 07-2152, 07-2311 Convictions and sentences for series of frauds against several states and a corporation are affirmed over claims that the district court erred by: 1) refusing to grant a new trial based on the government's alleged withholding of impeachment material and newly discovered exculpatory evidence; 2) refusing to sever defendants' trials; 3) improperly instructing the jury as to the meaning of "false statements" and… [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
In Abrams (1922), an intermediate appellate court overturned the order of California’s blue-sky administrator suspending a dealer’s license on the ground that a security he offered was fraudulent. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Van Arsdall, by limiting her cross-examination of a witness. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
State of Tennessee, No. 06-6208 In civil rights suit alleging that city police discriminated against plaintiffs in violation of the Ame [read post]
