Search for: "California National Bank v. Thomas" Results 1 - 20 of 159
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2012, 4:04 am by admin
   By Nancy Thomas, Will Stern, and Grant Schrader As California goes, so goes the nation? [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:13 am by The Complex Litigator
Nevertheless, relying on the California Supreme Court’s decision in Discover Bank v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 10:40 am by Jeremy T. Rosenblum and James Kim
Midland Funding, which held that a non-bank that purchased charged-off loans from a national bank could not charge the same rate of interest on the loans that the national bank charged under Section 85 of the National Bank Act (NBA). [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 12:50 am by Mike
District Court for the Northern District of California Bankruptcy Judges have recently released memorandum decisions, among them: Martinez v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:56 am by Amy Howe
Dean McGrath urges the Court to grant review in Arab Bank v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
Bank National Association v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 9:59 pm by Sam Eichner
On the one hand we have California’s Discover Bank rule, a judge-made doctrine based upon state unconscionability law. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 12:42 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. is a major national bank headquartered in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:05 am by Sabrina McCubbin
Miller, the Court held that a defendant had no right to privacy in his banking records, as they were business records belonging to the bank. [read post]
5 May 2016, 7:45 am by Laura Donohue
The controversy over the Second Bank of the United States, ostensibly settled in McCullough v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 3:40 am by Amy Howe
  In Bank Markazi v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 8:01 am by Thomas Kaufman
By Thomas Kaufman  (follow me on Twitter) On June 4, 2012, the California Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Two, issued Iskanian v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 4:50 pm
Tamara Bartlett of the Daily Californian reports here on the University of California Regents' request that the High Court hear its appeal to overturn a decision that banks could not be held responsible for their role in the Enron accounting fraud at the same time as the Stoneridge securities law case, which the Court already granted. [read post]